What about these guys? Most of them have been available in the last two years.
Demko - 93.6%
Hart - 92.4%
Swayman - 95.7%
Vejmelka - 92.6%
Reimer - 93.9%
Thompson - 93.3%
Hill - 91,5%
Jarry - 91%+ always
Georgiev - 91.8%
Saros - 91%
Gibson and Markstrom experienced starters.
A guy like Gustavsson had a very decent season last season and could be had cheaply.
There are always options and there is no way to justify Adams here. My complaints aren't even about Comrie. He was a wild card for a backup role and that's fine, but UPL is bad and Levi just came out of college at the end of last season.
UPL - trade
Comrie - backup
Levi - at least one season in Rochester
That's what Adams should have done, but he didn't do anything.
If you think that half the guys on your list are better than .900% behind this team the way they are playing D, I do not know what to tell you. I suggest you watch the goal highlights from the end of the season in Arizona where Vejmelka was giving up really ugly softies when his team stopped collapsing into a protective shell around him every game.
Demko was a goalie with two surgically rebuilt hips who was having major hip trouble and made one eyed Carter Hutton look good the way he was playing when he was on the block. The moment he was healthy and playing ok, Vancouver publicly announced he was not on the block.
No one is giving up what Philly wants for Hart until the Hockey Canada scandal is resolved, and nor should they.
When was Jarry available? Dubas gave him a 5x5.35M deal on July 1. You wanted Adams to go 5x6+?!? (likely what it would have taken). Does that really make sense to you with Levi in the system?
Saros is not signed long term and I'm asking you to go peruse the Saros to Buffalo thread to see the cost there.
The ask was usually something like Benson+Kulich+Peterka, or Savoie+Benson+Mitts. And for the record, I do not believe Saros was actually ever really available. In a press conference after Trotz was announced as the upcoming GM, Trotz said, and I quote, "Saros wants to be here. If he wants to be here, I want him to be here"
You can keep throwing out names and saying, "The GM blew it!!", but lets try to be a little realistic here. You constantly state points with 20-20 hindsight behind them without ever taking into account the facts of the situation at the time. It's like looking back at drafts from decades ago and saying, "WTF... why didn't our GM draft Alfredsson, Pavelski and Zetterberg?!?"