Zman5778
Moderator
Hart - yes
Gibson - yes (I know i'm in the minority)
Varlamov - yes
Jarry - yes
Andersen - yes
Vladar - probably no
I don't see any chance that a higher-end UFA like Varly or Jarry or Andersen signs here.
Hart - yes
Gibson - yes (I know i'm in the minority)
Varlamov - yes
Jarry - yes
Andersen - yes
Vladar - probably no
Why? Haven't the players changed their attitude towards Buffalo? So who knows. Andersen's sister signed with Buffalo.I don't see any chance that a higher-end UFA like Varly or Jarry or Andersen signs here.
Fowards and defense, sure.Why? Haven't the players changed their attitude towards Buffalo? So who knows. Andersen's sister signed with Buffalo.
Omg guys, how much can you talk about it? Man, retired Anderson at 90.7%, they'll see that too. It's not the defense's or Anderson's fault that Comrie and UPL bad. Also our defense will surely get better.Fowards and defense, sure.
I just think that goalies, whose contracts live and die by their numbers, will see the trainwreck that is our defense and say "nope -- there's no way I can put up solid numbers here". ESPECIALLY in light of what happened to Jack Campbell -- signed a big UFA deal and then absolutely struggled behind a defense on par with ours.
so does anybody think Adams is thinking that Comrie deserves a mulligan?
He played 10 good games for Winnipeg and that's it, before that he was the main goaltender in the AHL. Maybe he's just not that good, that's what usually happens. I don't like experiments like this, it's not a developmental season, so Adams should add goalie and top 4 D and make the playoffs like the Devils did last season.so does anybody think Adams is thinking that Comrie deserves a mulligan? NOT condoning it, but we all know how volatile goalies are year to year...They obviously liked something enough to give him 2 years.
He started out well enough, then had to play behind the MASH unit D until his injury 11/17, he then didn't start again until 1/10 and only started 1 more Jan game while UPL was on his rookie of the month run. Think there was another injury stint in there and only 2 Feb starts before 4 Mar starts.
No idea if he can replicate his WPG numbers again, but 100% healthy behind better D structure (and D health)? who knows
goalies
Can she stop a puck?Why? Haven't the players changed their attitude towards Buffalo? So who knows. Andersen's sister signed with Buffalo.
I think this can be forgotten, so adding top 4 D and decent goalie makes a lot of sense.ou also need a very good defensive system
Lance doesn’t think they do anything in goal because the trade options like Hellebuyck will be too rich for Adams and UFAs won’t want to play behind this team.
Lance doesn’t think they do anything in goal because the trade options like Hellebuyck will be too rich for Adams and UFAs won’t want to play behind this team.
Well, in this case, I think he is zigging with most others who have Adams focused on adding a D as opposed to a G.I'm down on faith in him as a source after Ryan Johnson.
Great reporter, but he seems to zag when everyone else zigs.
He could easily do both, and should. This shouldn't be a 1-addition offseason.Well, in this case, I think he is zigging with most others who have Adams focused on adding a D as opposed to a G.
I just do not see Adams giving up 3 or 4 1st round pick equivalents for a top 4 D and an NHL goalie that is likely to give them more than what they have in house.He could easily do both, and should. This shouldn't be a 1-addition offseason.
Skinner-Thompson-Tuch
Peterka-Cozens-Quinn
Greenway-Mittelstadt-Jost
Girgensons-Krebs-Okposo
Samuelsson-Dahlin
Power-Pesce
Stillman-Lyubushkin
Levi
Luukkonen
gets a C+ at best, even with the strong Pesce addition.
Lance doesn’t think they do anything in goal because the trade options like Hellebuyck will be too rich for Adams and UFAs won’t want to play behind this team.
I'm down on faith in him as a source after Ryan Johnson.
Great reporter, but he seems to zag when everyone else zigs.
No doubt, he's a great read, and among the best of the guys with that access level to the team...Lance's reporting has been the best available among the hockey writers that cover the team. For the record, I think his speculation is better than most as well, but there is no one that bats a thousand out there.
The Quiet Eye
The Quiet Eye is described as the final point of fixation of the gaze within 3 visual degrees (very close) to the object for at least 100 milliseconds. This was described by Dr. Joan Vickers at the University of Calgary. She has written an entire textbook on this subject (Vickers, 2007). It has been shown to be an effective technique in hockey goalies, in similar sporting tasks and even in medical surgery.
The Quiet Eye is exactly what it sounds like, the gaze is fixated and quiet. During this period of fixation, it is believed that the brain absorbs information from the shooter’s body movements, recognizes patterns and initiates a save selection before or as the puck is released. This is what seems to explain why goalies can predict shot directions.
Even the study suggesting that experts can see the object into the body with head-object coupling and saccades mentions that “expectation of the flightpath (potentially predicated on early ball-flight information) may have been helping … to facilitate head-ball coupling” (Mann et al., 2013, p.6).
In summary, fixating the right spot at the right time during the release may be the foundation upon which all important tracking skills are built.
Food for Thought
Many goalies today have covered the basic requirements of checking their vision with a professional, performing drills for smooth pursuit / saccades and have even learned how to couple the head with puck flight very well.
Is it not interesting to wonder why certain days we all describe that we are “just not seeing the puck”? Could it be possible that a consistent Quiet Eye could lead to consistent Tracking? Research seems to think so…
What is Still in Question?
Going back to the earlier discussion, we don’t yet know at what speed, or skill level it becomes impossible for goalies to track the puck into the body after smooth pursuit is exhausted. The study that suggested it can be done was performed with Cricket batters (Mann et al., 2013). Is it at 500 deg per second of eye rotation? Is this learned at the College level? At the professional level?
In a study by Vickers and Panchuk (2006), College and University goaltenders took shots from 5- and 10-meter distances. Eye tracking technology was used to show that these goalies did not track the puck in flight to any meaningful degree. The only variable that differentiated between a save and a goal was how well The Quiet Eye was performed. What we do not know is if shots in this experiment simply moved too fast or were from too close to track with the head and eyes. Another theory could be that these goalies were simply not skilled enough to do what the cricket batters were able to do.