All encompassing, never boring, occasional factual, turtle free Mason McTavish Trade (or not) thread! | Page 6 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

All encompassing, never boring, occasional factual, turtle free Mason McTavish Trade (or not) thread!

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
ok, when will the Mctavish for Schneider, Cuylle, and 26th pick be announced already? Beeker really going to drag this out, huh?
 
IMG_6636.jpeg

Someone who watches the Rangers explain why the guy at the bottom is something we would want?
 
Would be crazy if we get 5 for McT.

I see a case for it though.

I also understand how it’s an overpay.

If it really is 5 then blues offer has to be 11 + 16 or something .

Neither I see happening , overpay imo.

If reports are true ,

26 +

11 + small add

Pretty sure if we pull the trigger w NYR Rempe or Schneider is involved . Schneider would flourish in a system like ours. Worth mentioning out LHD are a lot different than the rangers. A lot more puck movers . Wouldn’t be bummed w it . I just want McTavbitch gone tbh . Seems like the gms agreed to have Verbeek sleep on it and decide on draft day. Would be kinda cool if we get to the pick we acquire and bettman / whoever says we have a trade to announce and no insiders report on it . Regardless, tomorrow is gonna be fun to watch/ witness as ducks fans. If we get a pick from Blues, hello Rudolph/Gustafson. Maybe Belchetz/Hemming. So many ways this goes. Haven’t had a draft like this in a while! Hell, Robertson nearly went to StL , Seattle today. (Yes Ik one was an offer sheet but yk what I’m saying) plus Hellyubuck/Larkin/Werenski may/will get dealt. Fun stuff
 
Friedman on 32 Thoughts says if it’s St.Louis the key piece is the 11th overall and if it’s New York then the key piece is a player, wouldn’t speculate who. Also added he didn’t think Verbeek wanted to make the 11th pick so they’d be looking into flipping it. Maybe that’s why this isn’t done right now.
 
Last edited:
This is so NOT Verbeek's typical process. We never know anything about what he's doing until its done. But this information has leaked out and I strongly believe it's Verbeek communicating through the media that he wants teams to sweeten their offers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2faded
It very much feels like verbeek’s option A is to get a big fish ( knies, larkin ect), but probably needs a top 15 pick to get them. I imagine he’s trying to do a three team trade where he moves mctavish for a pick and packages that with a player (minty?).

Otherwise it’s something like Cuylle +.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ducks DVM
It very much feels like verbeek’s option A is to get a big fish ( knies, larkin ect), but probably needs a top 15 pick to get them. I imagine he’s trying to do a three team trade where he moves mctavish for a pick and packages that with a player (minty?).

Otherwise it’s something like Cuylle +.
Why would a team with a top 15 pick settle for mctavish if they could get Knies instead with that pick and another player?
 
Oh I don’t know maybe the team that’s offering a top 15 pick for McTavish, good lord try and keep up.
I’m just trying to understand what you’re talking about. And the growing consensus seems to be that mctavish is a LW going forward so I think pretty much every team would agree that Knies would be the better LW of the two.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad