Mad Brills*
Guest
All this hype over someone who could easily be the next matt frattin, or best case scenario hayes or bozak.
Im a bit confused as to why Chicago is being mentioned... They just had a guy on LW who they traded because he didn't have much of a spot and they needed cap relief... And now they are going to get another LW who will be pushed out like TT was?
Doesnt make sense to me.
Tervainen was the price to pay to get rid of Bickell. TT wasn't dealt for cap space, he was dealt as a sweetener. I don't understand your confusion. A fresh LW on an ELC is the perfect replacement.
They didn't read the fine print.
I feel that Chicago will be on a slight downward trend after this coming season. Basically not cup contender quality. If Vesey wants to be apart of a possible future dynasty he should be looking towards Toronto, Buffalo, maybe NJ, or maybe even Pittsburgh who may just have begun a new dynasty.
WTF? Bickel was dealt 100% for creating cap space - Teräväinen was just the victim of it. Carolina wouldn't have touched Bickell even with a long wooden pole without Teräväinen being part of the package.
I can't think of one reason to sign with the Rangers, Devils, Toronto or Buffalo over Chicago.
Boston I can see because he's from there and prob a huge B's fan.
Toronto and Buffalo look like they have some good young players but dynasty? Hold on a minute and let them make the playoffs for a couple of seasons before even calling them contenders never mind a dynasty.
Pittsburgh is another story, they just don't seem that great but that is fine when no other team is that great either. They are one of the top teams but a dynasty? I don't see it. There were 5-6 teams who I though could have won the cup last year, Pittsburgh had everything fall right for them to win just like any other team would have had to have happen. They are not head and shoulders better than the other teams and I believe that to be a dynasty that is a requirement to me at least.
Did you even read my entire post, or just stop where you bolded it? We are saying the same thing.
You can also note that the Rangers are just as young
Tervainen was the price to pay to get rid of Bickell. TT wasn't dealt for cap space, he was dealt as a sweetener. I don't understand your confusion. A fresh LW on an ELC is the perfect replacement.
All this hype over someone who could easily be the next matt frattin, or best case scenario hayes or bozak.
All this hype over someone who could easily be the next matt frattin, or best case scenario hayes or bozak.
Yeah, so Teräväinen was traded because of Chicago's cap problems. Just like Saad (and Leddy) was.
Chicago has a clear resume of shipping away its players for cap reasons. Vesey has no guarantee that he won't be one of those many victims.
I've seen you make many of these posts complaining about the hype. Why do you keep returning to threads if hes so overhyped? I'm genuinely curious.
Yea, Chicago is a pretty good springboard to launch a career.
Besides who knows what is going to happen 3-years from now? Worse case scenario for him he's a plug - best he gets a huge pay day.
thats great for you guys! As much as we haven't had first round picks we still keep on racking up young players especially in the middle roundsBruins last 3 years 6 firsts and 5 seconds- Pastrnak from 2014 already leading rookie forward class in goals
5 D in top two rounds
McAvoy
Zboril
Carlo
Lindgren
Lauzon
Rangers 0 first rounders in last 4 years
Love reading here how the Bruins are old and trending down but sounds good
If you can add him for free, I think any team would want him. He probably is not the second coming of Matt Frattin, so that's that.
Toronto and Buffalo look like they have some good young players but dynasty? Hold on a minute and let them make the playoffs for a couple of seasons before even calling them contenders never mind a dynasty.
Pittsburgh is another story, they just don't seem that great but that is fine when no other team is that great either. They are one of the top teams but a dynasty? I don't see it. There were 5-6 teams who I though could have won the cup last year, Pittsburgh had everything fall right for them to win just like any other team would have had to have happen. They are not head and shoulders better than the other teams and I believe that to be a dynasty that is a requirement to me at least.
Tervainen was the price to pay to get rid of Bickell. TT wasn't dealt for cap space, he was dealt as a sweetener. I don't understand your confusion. A fresh LW on an ELC is the perfect replacement.
Yeah, so Teräväinen was traded because of Chicago's cap problems. Just like Saad (and Leddy) was.
Chicago has a clear resume of shipping away its players for cap reasons. Vesey has no guarantee that he won't be one of those many victims.
Yes, but while those guys were eventually shipped out they all won Cups in the meantime. You don't think that would have some appeal to a young player? Compete for a cup on a contender right out the gate and then in two years you get moved, potentially to one of those up and coming teams that at that point would actually be a contender rather than the up and coming team that they are now?