Proposal: All Bruins trade rumors/proposals: 16/17 Part VI

[sarge88]

I can remember as a kid listening to a Bruin - Habs game and the Great Dick Irvin raving about Kluzak. Saying the Bruins don't only have one of the top defenseman in the NHL they now have two!

To be honest, Thelven was not far behind, IMO.

Another very good player whose career was cut short by knee injuries.

 

[sarge88]

Read somewhere that the Habs were interested in McKinnon/Duschene.

 

[PB37]

The old "you have hated Krug from the get go" argument AGAIN. How many time do I have to say that I don't. IMO he is a 3rd pairing, at most, D-man on a Cup contending team, which, in case you don't know, is where we are trying to go. BTY, I laugh at a lot of your "instant classics" just like you do mine.

You think Krug is a third pairing dman at most: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=124837931&postcount=957

You don't think Krug can run a PP: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=125172663&postcount=261

You have doubts that Krug can be a PP specialist and think he's a detriment to the PP: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=124868351&postcount=977

You think Krug is worth a 3rd rounder or a 4th liner: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=127379061&postcount=635

You once advocated trading Krug for Kassian: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=94411825&postcount=306

You started a thinly veiled Krug hate thread and got called out on it: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1638997&highlight=

And only because the board search engine doesn't go back far enough, it stops there. But as you can see in the above thread from three years ago. you had been lumping on Krug further back.

Basically anytime you post something about Krug, it should come complete with a fart noise.

 

[Ratty]

You think Krug is a third pairing dman at most: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=124837931&postcount=957

You don't think Krug can run a PP: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=125172663&postcount=261

You have doubts that Krug can be a PP specialist and think he's a detriment to the PP: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=124868351&postcount=977

You think Krug is worth a 3rd rounder or a 4th liner: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=127379061&postcount=635

You once advocated trading Krug for Kassian: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=94411825&postcount=306

You started a thinly veiled Krug hate thread and got called out on it: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1638997&highlight=

And only because the board search engine doesn't go back far enough, it stops there. But as you can see in the above thread from three years ago. you had been lumping on Krug further back.

Basically anytime you post something about Krug, it should come complete with a fart noise.

Points well made. But he did predict a Julien firing.

 

[Oates2Neely]

You think Krug is a third pairing dman at most: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=124837931&postcount=957

You don't think Krug can run a PP: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=125172663&postcount=261

You have doubts that Krug can be a PP specialist and think he's a detriment to the PP: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=124868351&postcount=977

You think Krug is worth a 3rd rounder or a 4th liner: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=127379061&postcount=635

You once advocated trading Krug for Kassian: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showpost.php?p=94411825&postcount=306

You started a thinly veiled Krug hate thread and got called out on it: http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1638997&highlight=

And only because the board search engine doesn't go back far enough, it stops there. But as you can see in the above thread from three years ago. you had been lumping on Krug further back.

Basically anytime you post something about Krug, it should come complete with a fart noise.

Roasted. Well done.

Krug is a fine 3-4 at worst. Kid has the heart of a lion. Once Chara retires and Bergeron takes the 'C', I foresee Krug wearing an 'A'

 

[GoBs]

Krug does an excellent job running the PP you can not disagree with that.
But he is a third pairing on this team and most others.
Wth the emergence of Colon Miller and if they ever give Joe Morrow a legitimate shot Krug fits in perfect at the fifth or sixth spot.

 

[Goulet17]

Terry Frei tweeted that Sakic and the two other Avs reps are attending the Beanpot final tomorrow against Harvard and Boston.

 

[ON3M4N]

Cehlarik should not prevent a Landeskog trade. Cehlarik's natural position is RW, even though he's left handed. He played RW down in Providence and while he was overseas.

Marchand -- Bergeron -- Pasta

Landeskog -- Krejci -- Cehlarik

Vatrano -- Spooner -- Backes

Schaller -- Moore -- Nash

Backes has actually looked good on the 1st line, not sure I'd break them up. Being Cehlarik can play either side (like Frankie), I could see him on the 3rd line instead. Actually could give a pretty interest young line.

Marchand - Bergeron - Backes
Landeskog - Krejci - Pastrnak
Vatrano - Spooner - Cehlarik
Schaller - Moore - Nash

 

[ON3M4N]

Terry Frei tweeted that Sakic and the two other Avs reps are attending the Beanpot final tomorrow against Harvard and Boston.

Could be just a general scouting trip for the draft.

 

[BostonBob]

Bruins should have held onto P Eaves . Perhaps he's available. 1 less goal versus Pasta. Cheap player that can be had.

The same Patrick Eaves that outside of this season has averaged 8 goals per season since leaving Boston back in 2009.

 

[Oates2Neely]

Krug does an excellent job running the PP you can not disagree with that.
But he is a third pairing on this team and most others.
Wth the emergence of Colon Miller and if they ever give Joe Morrow a legitimate shot Krug fits in perfect at the fifth or sixth spot.

Am I reading that correctly? Are you suggesting Morrow and CMiller bump Krug down to the 3rd pairing?

 

[DKH]

I'm all in on landeskog. My guess is Carlo is the guy going back. As much as I like Carlo the Bruins have a lot of D prospects and Colin Miller has been good. He's a right shot and he's an NHL player - he may even be part of the deal

Maybe Cehlarik is up for the Avs to scout

Carlo & Cehlarik?

Landeskog is a guy i have coveted

 

[ON3M4N]

I'm all in on landeskog. My guess is Carlo is the guy going back. As much as I like Carlo the Bruins have a lot of D prospects and Colin Miller has been good. He's a right shot and he's an NHL player - he may even be part of the deal

Maybe Cehlarik is up for the Avs to scout

Carlo & Cehlarik?

Landeskog is a guy i have coveted

It kind of a double edge sword, but lets hope MTL give them the d they want for Duchene and then the asking price for Landeskog comes down.

 

[22Brad Park]

I'm all in on landeskog. My guess is Carlo is the guy going back. As much as I like Carlo the Bruins have a lot of D prospects and Colin Miller has been good. He's a right shot and he's an NHL player - he may even be part of the deal

Maybe Cehlarik is up for the Avs to scout

Carlo & Cehlarik?

Landeskog is a guy i have coveted

Big price for a player who has regressed and does not play same brand as when drafted. Now I think he would make a good Bruin but it's a bit steep if Carlo is in that deal. Be an entire year wasted grooming him Bruins need to find a way to swing it where they can keep Carlo and McAvoy.

 

[22Brad Park]

It kind of a double edge sword, but lets hope MTL give them the d they want for Duchene and then the asking price for Landeskog comes down.

Why would Colorado ask less if they know they can pry more? Sweeney needs to be really careful.Years of future at stake .

 

[Absurdity]

I'm not a fan of the Bruins trading for Landeskog especially if it involves someone like Carlo going the other way. I'm getting 14-15 Lucic vibes from him. If I'm the Bruins, I would rather target Duchene or MacKinnon.

 

[Coach Parker]

I'm all in on landeskog. My guess is Carlo is the guy going back. As much as I like Carlo the Bruins have a lot of D prospects and Colin Miller has been good. He's a right shot and he's an NHL player - he may even be part of the deal

Maybe Cehlarik is up for the Avs to scout

Carlo & Cehlarik?

Landeskog is a guy i have coveted

I'm with you DKH and think that is the type of deal that actually works for the Bruins going forward. Carlo is a steep price to pay and Miller has looked good on display these last two games.

This is the second time this week an actual GM has been at the Bruins games. Chances are for the NCAA scouting but if that was the case wouldn't a lot more GM's be here for the games?

Targets:

Cehlarik, C.Miller, Carlo, Spooner, Hayes, K.Miller.

Not playing targets:

Bruins 1st, anyone in BU or BC.

 

[DKH]

Big price for a player who has regressed and does not play same brand as when drafted. Now I think he would make a good Bruin but it's a bit steep if Carlo is in that deal. Be an entire year wasted grooming him Bruins need to find a way to swing it where they can keep Carlo and McAvoy.

I know what you think of Sweeney but what I was told in the last day is that he and his staff and scouts have put the Bruins spot with many progressing prospects and not enough room

He told me players like Pastrnak who all of a sudden is looking like a soon to be top line player and Colin Miller who has progressed to the point he needs to be taken seriously have changed things for Boston

Also it's sounding like Sweeney and his staff like Bradley JFJ have a strengthened say in on ice talent. Interpret it how you may I know I got what was meant and I'm happy.

The Bruins do like landeskog but couldn't tell you if it's he or Duschene but I'm going with GL

 

[Coach Parker]

You can choose to believe that, it's your right.

I won't, because I know they have talked to two teams and couldn't agree on the package. They negotiate and if it happens next week it's not because of Julien, it's because that's how negotiations work.

and if there are two teams, there are bound to be many more.

#MyTwoCents

After weeks/months of talk:

Sweeney: 'If we are going to do this trade, I'd like it to happen during our bye week so the coaches and players can come together (ala 2011) on the road trip after a solid rest.'

GM: 'Fair enough. This is my price. I've sent scouts to look at _______ and _______ and I'll come myself to see __________ if we want to make this move now.'

Sweeney: 'Get Claude on the phone please.'

Gallant was fired before his players were coming back from IR and would get the boost the team needed. GM wanted to go in a different direction. I don't see how this would be any different. If it was really just the coach then no need to do a move this week because it seems to have paid off early.

If it was the coach and the holes in the lineup then try plugging the holes first with the move and see how the coach handles them...unless you know the move will improve the team now and keep the coach on until at least the playoffs. Window closed to fire him.

Again, if no move is made this week this point is moot. But if the Bruins make their big trade before Saturday against San Jose...suddenly since the coach was fired the GMs had a change of heart on the packages and trade enough to do it now and not wait until the deadline?

 

[Oates2Neely]

After weeks/months of talk:

Sweeney: 'If we are going to do this trade, I'd like it to happen during our bye week so the coaches and players can come together (ala 2011) on the road trip after a solid rest.'

GM: 'Fair enough. This is my price. I've sent scouts to look at _______ and _______ and I'll come myself to see __________ if we want to make this move now.'

Sweeney: 'Get Claude on the phone please.'

Gallant was fired before his players were coming back from IR and would get the boost the team needed. GM wanted to go in a different direction. I don't see how this would be any different. If it was really just the coach then no need to do a move this week because it seems to have paid off early.

If it was the coach and the holes in the lineup then try plugging the holes first with the move and see how the coach handles them...unless you know the move will improve the team now and keep the coach on until at least the playoffs. Window closed to fire him.

Again, if no move is made this week this point is moot. But if the Bruins make their big trade before Saturday against San Jose...suddenly since the coach was fired the GMs had a change of heart on the packages and trade enough to do it now and not wait until the deadline?

You're really hitching your wagon to this one Coach. Will be interesting to watch it play out

 

[DKH]

You can choose to believe that, it's your right.

I won't, because I know they have talked to two teams and couldn't agree on the package. They negotiate and if it happens next week it's not because of Julien, it's because that's how negotiations work.

and if there are two teams, there are bound to be many more.

#MyTwoCents

Your track record of information told to me that hits is quite impressive

You know I had trouble with coming around for years on what just transpired this week but when I heard the name Heidi Holland was involved I was stunned and kudos to you

 

[Over the volcano]

maybe chiller

It would beat exposing him to the expansion draft. . .

 

[Blowfish]

I don't think the Bruins can afford to move the Krug/Carlo types until they know the prospects will actually replace them.

Certainly not for just Landeskog.

Why Landeskog? This feels Belesky results to me.

 

[22Brad Park]

I know what you think of Sweeney but what I was told in the last day is that he and his staff and scouts have put the Bruins spot with many progressing prospects and not enough room

He told me players like Pastrnak who all of a sudden is looking like a soon to be top line player and Colin Miller who has progressed to the point he needs to be taken seriously have changed things for Boston

Also it's sounding like Sweeney and his staff like Bradley JFJ have a strengthened say in on ice talent. Interpret it how you may I know I got what was meant and I'm happy.

The Bruins do like landeskog but couldn't tell you if it's he or Duschene but I'm going with GL

I know Bradley has a big say.On Behind the B his big trap helped push Seguin out.But as far as Sweeney .I just want him to make a decent move and not get ripped.I am on board for Landy but cannot include just 2 players Carlo ir McAvoy.If system as good as alot say prospect wise then he should still be able to find a way to make it work.

 

[Goulet17]

It's Joe Sakic (GM), Chris MacFarland (Asst. GM), and an Avs scout at the Montreal-Boston game.