Flannelman
Quiet, Gnashgab.
- Dec 3, 2006
- 13,880
- 3,148
I know we'll be pretty underwhelmed.
Anticipation of have you heard a bit extra?
I know we'll be pretty underwhelmed.
Spooner for Austin Watson
Spooner for Austin Watson
Seguin trade was a mistake. Not because we traded him, but because of what we got back in return.
Boychuk trade was a bad mistake, not just because we got 2 2nd round picks, but because we didn't flip those picks immediately for something useful. I would have rather done a 3-way trade to get a helpful player in return. But we got nothing to show for this year.
Bruins are slumping. Yes they can play better, but they need a shakeup. Dear santa, just GET TAYLOR HALL and see what happens next!
I still say we need to add instead of substitute. I would go full bore for Simmonds. With Simmonds on our first line, it gives us a great top 9. You just need to put youngsters on the 4th line because that energy line is out of energy.
Simmonds has another 4 years on his contract after this year so I would be OK giving alot up in terms of picks/prospects/futures to get him.
I would try:
1 prospect - pick any one
Boston 1st and 2nd this year
If Philly wants players, I would offer one of: Miller, Bartkowski, Paille or even Seidenberg
Simmonds fixes our offence. Lucic seems to perform better with a physical right winger, keep the second and third lines the way they are and just upgrade the energy line. Wouldn't hurt to trade Campbell and fill the line with Cunningham and whomever.
Seems like a decent basis for a deal. Watson is a guy I could see the B's liking.
I still say we need to add instead of substitute. I would go full bore for Simmonds. With Simmonds on our first line, it gives us a great top 9. You just need to put youngsters on the 4th line because that energy line is out of energy.
Simmonds has another 4 years on his contract after this year so I would be OK giving alot up in terms of picks/prospects/futures to get him.
I would try:
1 prospect - pick any one
Boston 1st and 2nd this year
If Philly wants players, I would offer one of: Miller, Bartkowski, Paille or even Seidenberg
Simmonds fixes our offence. Lucic seems to perform better with a physical right winger, keep the second and third lines the way they are and just upgrade the energy line. Wouldn't hurt to trade Campbell and fill the line with Cunningham and whomever.
So basically Pastrnak+1st+2nd for Simmonds. Way too much for a non-contender to spend on a guy who isn't a franchise player.I still say we need to add instead of substitute. I would go full bore for Simmonds. With Simmonds on our first line, it gives us a great top 9. You just need to put youngsters on the 4th line because that energy line is out of energy.
Simmonds has another 4 years on his contract after this year so I would be OK giving alot up in terms of picks/prospects/futures to get him.
I would try:
1 prospect - pick any one
Boston 1st and 2nd this year
If Philly wants players, I would offer one of: Miller, Bartkowski, Paille or even Seidenberg
Simmonds fixes our offence. Lucic seems to perform better with a physical right winger, keep the second and third lines the way they are and just upgrade the energy line. Wouldn't hurt to trade Campbell and fill the line with Cunningham and whomever.
Overpayment man.I still say we need to add instead of substitute. I would go full bore for Simmonds. With Simmonds on our first line, it gives us a great top 9. You just need to put youngsters on the 4th line because that energy line is out of energy.
Simmonds has another 4 years on his contract after this year so I would be OK giving alot up in terms of picks/prospects/futures to get him.
I would try:
1 prospect - pick any one
Boston 1st and 2nd this year
If Philly wants players, I would offer one of: Miller, Bartkowski, Paille or even Seidenberg
Simmonds fixes our offence. Lucic seems to perform better with a physical right winger, keep the second and third lines the way they are and just upgrade the energy line. Wouldn't hurt to trade Campbell and fill the line with Cunningham and whomever.
All this talk aside, Chiarelli seems content with what he has on the ice. The most boring team in the East and maybe the NHL.
I regularly attend NHL games and the only thing stopping the Bruins from being the Wild/Predators of the past NHL (no one wants to go see 2-1, 1-0 games when the NHL teams cycle down deep, pass to the point, and hope for a tip in/deflection or rebound from the point shot) is the loyal Boston fanbase in the cities.
When people stop buying tickets to come to the Bruins games in Boston because it is boring as hell, you'll hear a different tune from Chiarelli.
No we don't. Never liked the system from day one. Hate......hate.......the cycling.
Actually, we do. Every game out West I have been to has a large number of Bruins fans coming to see them because 'I only get to see this team once a year'. What they see is a boring team play the cycle, then leave well-rested from their nap during the second period of the game.
This is a business. An entertainment business. I cannot name more than five games this year where you could walk away from the Boston Bruins playing on the ice and say you were entertained. One scout/management I spoke to said it best: 'at least that Pastrnak kid is entertaining. He will be good.'
Hopefully people have been watching the WJC games and are being reminded what creativity and entertaining hockey entails; chances, mistakes and scoring off of the rush/when opportunity presents itself.
Actually, we do. Every game out West I have been to has a large number of Bruins fans coming to see them because 'I only get to see this team once a year'. What they see is a boring team play the cycle, then leave well-rested from their nap during the second period of the game.
This is a business. An entertainment business. I cannot name more than five games this year where you could walk away from the Boston Bruins playing on the ice and say you were entertained. One scout/management I spoke to said it best: 'at least that Pastrnak kid is entertaining. He will be good.'
Hopefully people have been watching the WJC games and are being reminded what creativity and entertaining hockey entails; chances, mistakes and scoring off of the rush/when opportunity presents itself.
I miss those creative days. Freaken trap!!
Agreed!
An injection of something new would be amazing right about now. New meaning a different approach to offensive attack and scoring methods. That is why I was looking forward to Pastrnak getting a shot with Krejci and Lucic. It is also why adding Perron was, to me, more of the same scoring style and philosophy.
You'd think the Krejci comments would be enough to make them finally pull the trigger, but tossing them under the bus before that could also work.
Maybe if they are lucky now, the shots from the point WILL be deflected in, the rebounds WILL be put in from close range and the Bruins will win the boring games instead of losing them.
Trade idea to finally bring Hall to Boston
To Edmonton: Seidenberg, Bartowski, Spooner, Soderberg, Svedberg , 1st round pick
To Bruins: Hall, Purcell, Klefbom
Bruins lineup after trade
Lucic Krejci Hall
Marchand Bergeron Smith
Ericksson Kelly Purcell
Griffith Campbell Paille
Chara Hamilton
Krug Miller
Morrow Mcquaid
Klefbom
Rask
Subban
Oilers lineup after trade
Perron RNH Eberle
Pouliot Soderberg Yakupov
Drasaitl Spooner Pitlick
Hendricks Arcobello Pinizotto
Seidenberg Shultz
Ference Bartowski
Hunt Fyane
Svedberg
Scrivens
Looks like a good trade for both team
All this talk aside, Chiarelli seems content with what he has on the ice. The most boring team in the East and maybe the NHL.
I regularly attend NHL games and the only thing stopping the Bruins from being the Wild/Predators of the past NHL (no one wants to go see 2-1, 1-0 games when the NHL teams cycle down deep, pass to the point, and hope for a tip in/deflection or rebound from the point shot) is the loyal Boston fanbase in the cities.
When people stop buying tickets to come to the Bruins games in Boston because it is boring as hell, you'll hear a different tune from Chiarelli.
Appreciate the sentiment-- having Hall here would be awesome-- but there's no way Edmonton will send Hall our way without one of Rask, Lucic, or Hamilton, being the centrepiece of those players sent back.