GDT: ALIENS @ WHAT

HisIceness

This is Hurricanes Hockey
Sep 16, 2010
41,768
74,538
Charlotte
Nino was such a great acquisition at the right time when the season was turning for the better. Scored the goal (one of 69 nice ones here) that solidified the playoff spot ending the drought.

I loved the guy, but UFA/cap is what it is. I get the feeling he'll be back before retirement, like a 1 year let's get the Cup deal a la CDH and Stepan now.
 

Borsig

PoKechetkov
Nov 3, 2007
5,175
10,076
Low country coast
On a serious note, Nino was one of my favorite recent canes. I felt like we did just enough stupid shit to not pay him. (usless ass Bear and his 2.5 million could have easily been put with what we paid a guy like Kase and the rest made up to keep the best shutdown line in the game together)

Odds on Nino scoring a goal tonight? High. Odds on it being the gwg? Well that's what our ex players do when they come here.

It will be a get what you deserve moment.

It was one of the stupidest things we've done in recent off years. He wanted to be here and he was not expensive. Instead we spent on Bear and had to go out and get a glass player that played one game before the inevitable.

/rant.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,331
102,073
Nino's struggles in the playoffs is probably a main reason they didn't want to re-up him for as much as the market would ask and/or go in a different direction.

7G, 12P, -12 in 43 playoff games. That's the same number of points as Brock McGinn had 35 games and Warren Foegele had in 34 games; 1 more than Martinook had in 35 games, and 2 less than Pesce had in 40 games.

I like Nino a lot and wanted to keep him, but I understand why the Canes may have thought they needed to go in a different direction.
 

Borsig

PoKechetkov
Nov 3, 2007
5,175
10,076
Low country coast
Nino's struggles in the playoffs is probably a main reason they didn't want to re-up him for as much as the market would ask and/or go in a different direction.

7G, 12P, -12 in 43 playoff games. That's the same number of points as Brock McGinn had 35 games and Warren Foegele had in 34 games; 1 more than Martinook had in 35 games, and 2 less than Pesce had in 40 games.

I like Nino a lot and wanted to keep him, but I understand why the Canes may have thought they needed to go in a different direction.
And yet Ginner sent the caps packing when it counted in the never ending game 7.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,331
102,073
You're right. A pile of stats doesn't compare to being the guy that made the play that sent you on to the next round.

No, it's just you're poor reading comprehension.

I never said anything about McGinn not scoring enough. McGinn was a bottom six guy who wasn't counted on to score a lot of goals (and wasn't paid as such). He was great in his role and any scoring was a bonus. And he came through in the clutch as you stated.

My point was that Nino, who was paid to score GOALS was scoring at a rate lower than guys who aren't counted upon to score (McGinn, Foegele, Pesce, Martinook, etc..).

So it wasn't a negative comment about McGinn's production, it was a comment about Nino in comparison to guys who aren't counted upon to score a lot of goals.

Nino's production in the playoffs wasn't good. That's the point.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad