This is a complete fabrication on your part. There weren’t any concerns at all regarding his skating at the time of the draft. If you’re going to post BS like this, where is the proof? Link to a source prior to the draft that mentioned his skating as a weakness.
I do not have to capitulate to yr demand it be before the draft
This guy was close to consensus 1OA, and there were red flags, but it was not presumed to be so severe as it turned out to actually be.
Draisatil had problems for 2-3 months w/his skating when he first got here. Of course, he is a magnificent beast of a phys specimen, so once they figured it out he was fully on track. LaF is taking longer, but he has arrived -- barely, but is there.
So asked....
Took me about 15 seconds on Google. You should try it.
Skating Grade: 55
If I had to pick a weakness in Lafreniere’s game, this would be the area to focus on, but I still give it an above-average grade. I say “weakness” because, in watching a lot of Lafrenière’s games, I find his game can lack pace and speed at times. He doesn’t hit the line with speed on a lot of his zone entries and the play dies on his stick.
Breaking down the potential No. 1 pick's games, with thoughts from the player himself and his coach.
theathletic.com
But I'm sure you'll ignore it and spew more nonsense. No doubt. lol
well said.
... and answered....
Nonsense? I’ve done nothing but post verifiable fact, along with Lafreniere’s stats. Apparently that’s offensive to NYR fans.
And I said before the draft. That piece is from a columnist after NHL training camp, when we had the benefit of seeing him against NHL competition. Not to mention, the guy clarifies that he doesn’t consider it a weakness, per se, but an area for Laf to work on. That’s a stark contrast from what the other poster was claiming.
And now w/denial we see moving the goalposts by saying the opinion is from a columnist, and it is after training camp.
If we knew LaF was gonna have such skating issues, we'd have either taken Byfield, or more likely, not thrown him to the wolves on day 1 and made sure we worked extensively on his skating
How about Hanifin for Lefreniere plus a pcik or prospect?
Can't make the time not to give this the full consideration it deserves, but that said, if we are selling LaF for profit to the highest bidder, then:
1. CGY bids are no less welcome
competing bids push up price.
2. Some variation of LaF + for Hanny + makes a lot of sense.
Howev, besides value, NY needs to address how as to cap [see below]
I would love that, I just think the main reason NYR would move him is cap space so i’m not sure if they could afford Hanifin. But I definitely like that from a Flames perspective.
Even if they don't ltb [listen to bern] they can still do it tho more extreme moves need to be made.
bern suggests from prior and now also:
1.
Panarin reduced 1.x+ down to an even 10 per + nyr 2024, 2025 and 2026 1sts
to Ana
for Ducks 2024, 2025 and 2026 2nds + Vatrano
2.
Lindgren + NNYR 2nd + Leshitshow [cap dump] + Lindbom [a 36OA G]
for
Helleson + BOS 2024 1st
explain:
Strome + bread have chemistry
Ana has enuf cap space,
has added good young pivots incl Carlsson, the next Getzlaf
Strome fully replaceable
max production of Strome + bread as a pair, retain if nec, deal for profit
Lindgren is like 25 you are looking at 5ish yrs before he breaks down, but that is 5 solid years.
Younger, replaces Fowler at 31, so sell high on him
losing Helleson is a wince, but overall is good
____________
NOW, if NYR does THAT
then
there is ample room to add Hannifin
NY needs to extend KAM and push both Robertson + Scanlin, but
Hani as a stopgap at min works nice
--- IF we first move bread
If you want Lafreniere, you don't start there...you start w/KA Miller. Offer him 3 X $6.4 million and really put NYR on the spot. If they match, then you offer Laf 3 X $4.2 million. In both cases, the kids end up arbitration eligible RFAs. Contracts could be structured w/signing bonuses and larger last year $$$.
Almost positive NYR matches on Miller and that puts them in a damn near untenable position on Laf. If they don't match on Miller, then you get a premier, young defender for a 1st and a 3rd. I think that puts the Rangers in such a difficult position given the NMCs they've got.....and dealing Goodrow still wouldn't give them enough cap space to sign Laf in the above scenario.
That's good offensive strategy, but NYR has other options to extend KAM full 8 x 6.25
LaF may decide to stay w/productive kid line esp if they ltb and make it #1 line = mo mins = mo pts = mo $$
betting on himself a la Judge may be smartest move
and NY can still move various other pieces to get cap it needs
just stupid to not have done it my way before