Player Discussion Alexandre Carrier

Pompeius Magnus

Registered User
May 18, 2014
21,368
19,471
Kanata ,ON
He needed to solidify his spot this season with how the organization perceives Mailloux and Reinbacher. He did not take the necessary leap and they got some certainty on the blueline this year when they've needed it.

He had his window with the organization and it closed. I don't discount the possibility he could still be a PP2, 3rd pair RD for the Predators long term. He was just gonna get passed over here in short order.
Sure, he could still figure it out. He never found that extra gear with us, his time had passed.
 

OldCraig71

Sleeveen
Feb 2, 2009
36,302
57,816
No one cares


Put them neck and neck and it becomes obvious why Trotz could not resist reaching for Barron. :sarcasm:

5McZQfP.jpg

Trotz should have used Head and Shoulders shampoo in his earlier years. Barron looks like someone who overdosed on it lol.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Fatbiggie

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,467
12,281
yes he did.
Barron is a AHL d man at best.

now what to do with Math?
The left side doesn't need Matheson, Guhle/Hutson/Xhekaj is a good left side despite how young it is.

The right side is still weak outside the vets and I expect one of Savard/Matheson to traded by the deadline. So conundrum...because Carrier can't carry the right side by himself next season...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dagistitsyn

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,491
6,586
yes he did.
Barron is a AHL d man at best.

now what to do with Math?
I could somewhat deal with Matheson brain cramps but not if you added Barron’s. It’s already better for the time being.

We know Matheson will f*** up bad regularly but now it’s only one guy. The other Ds might make the odd bad decision but are not sloppy like Barron.
 

Dagistitsyn

Registered User
Aug 27, 2011
5,372
575
Nova Scotia
Barron was really bad. We needed a steady right handed D that isn’t another rookie. Trade makes sense, especially if Savard gets moved at the trade deadline.
 

Dagistitsyn

Registered User
Aug 27, 2011
5,372
575
Nova Scotia
The left side doesn't need Matheson, Guhle/Hutson/Xhekaj is a good left side despite how young it is.

The right side is still weak outside the vets and I expect one of Savard/Matheson to traded by the deadline. So conundrum...because Carrier can't carry the right side by himself next season...

Yep. It’s an no brainer. Ideally we trade Matheson + pick + prospect for an actual good top 4 pairing RHD.

On the right side in no particular order, depending on how Reinbacher looks after the injury and how Mailloux develops his defensive game this year in the AHL.

*Insert trade acquisition*
Carrier
Reinbacher
Mailloux
 

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
37,067
23,807
Nova Scotia
Visit site
I believe that Hutson can take up alot of Matheson's minutes but I don't think the Habs are ready to move Matheson or Savard yet.
I think HuGo will sit patiently, because they can, and if they get a big offer for either guy, then they move one or both....................more than likely just Saavvy at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,467
12,281
Yep. It’s an no brainer. Ideally we trade Matheson + pick + prospect for an actual good top 4 pairing RHD.

On the right side in no particular order, depending on how Reinbacher looks after the injury and how Mailloux develops his defensive game this year in the AHL.

*Insert trade acquisition*
Carrier
Reinbacher
Mailloux
I don't even think the Habs are going to look at a top 4 vets RHD now that they have Carrier. They might try to trade Matheson for a RHD prospect thought, because that side of the prospect pool is still kinda weak with the question marks on Reinbacher/Mailloux.

And we can also add Engstrom (even if LHD) and Konyushkov (if he buy back his last contract year) for possible RD canditates next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VirginiaMtlExpat

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,841
74,468
Texas
I think HuGo will sit patiently, because they can, and if they get a big offer for either guy, then they move one or both....................more than likely just Saavvy at this point.
The best way to help young D learn is to surround them with good vets, Carrier helps immensely
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

EXPOS123

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
1,512
1,900
Nashville fan here. He's not going to net you a 1st, if he was going to we'd have done it by now.

He's a good no.5 defenseman who can play in the top 4 sporadically or more permanently when tied to a more stable partner.
Thanks. The problem for me is is that type of player worth close to 4 million per year?

We already have so many bad contracts as is and trying to get out of and now we are tying ourselves to another one
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,841
74,468
Texas
Thanks. The problem for me is is that type of player worth close to 4 million per year?

We already have so many bad contracts as is and trying to get out of and now we are tying ourselves to another one
In today's NHL bottom pairing D vets are going for 3+ million per season.
 

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,792
5,871
Visit site
Carrier may be servicable but is a downgrade to Savard or Math so they think Guhle and X can carry the team on their back. Expect both to play 24-25 minutes.

I love it...but given the glassy nature of Guhle, X better buy a lot of foot powder and Popeil foot massager.

(Go ahead, tell me that you thought this was the path. Yes, me and my mirror are taking credit for believing he can...but the truth? Making me a bit nervous)

Struble has miles to go and Mailman/Engstrom are servicable but still a risk.

Hutson is in his own league in a very high offence but limited defense.

So...most likely say goodbye to Savard and if we get a kings ransom, goodbye to Meth. Otherwise Meth stays for another year.

Swim...or sink time...
 

Deebs

Take my strong advice, always think twice
Feb 5, 2014
17,499
14,523
Carrier may be servicable but is a downgrade to Savard or Math so they think Guhle and X can carry the team on their back. Expect both to play 24-25 minutes.

I love it...but given the glassy nature of Guhle, X better buy a lot of foot powder and Popeil foot massager.

(Go ahead, tell me that you thought this was the path. Yes, me and my mirror are taking credit for believing he can...but the truth? Making me a bit nervous)

Struble has miles to go and Mailman/Engstrom are servicable but still a risk.

Hutson is in his own league in a very high offence but limited defense.

So...most likely say goodbye to Savard and if we get a kings ransom, goodbye to Meth. Otherwise Meth stays for another year.

Swim...or sink time...
Present day Savard is barely an everyday NHL player, Carrier is an upgrade there. If we get offered a 3rd-4th rounder for him, we must take it and run when the time comes.

Matheson, like Guhle before him, should not be playing on his offside as it makes him a worse player but those are the cards we're dealt at the moment. I expect him to be moved at the deadline and hopefully we can have a RD replace him either in that deal or another.
 

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
16,036
7,120
Carrier may be servicable but is a downgrade to Savard or Math so they think Guhle and X can carry the team on their back. Expect both to play 24-25 minutes.

I love it...but given the glassy nature of Guhle, X better buy a lot of foot powder and Popeil foot massager.

(Go ahead, tell me that you thought this was the path. Yes, me and my mirror are taking credit for believing he can...but the truth? Making me a bit nervous)

Struble has miles to go and Mailman/Engstrom are servicable but still a risk.

Hutson is in his own league in a very high offence but limited defense.

So...most likely say goodbye to Savard and if we get a kings ransom, goodbye to Meth. Otherwise Meth stays for another year.

Swim...or sink time...
I think Xhekaj is on the bottom pairing no matter what
 

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,792
5,871
Visit site
Present day Savard is barely an everyday NHL player, Carrier is an upgrade there. If we get offered a 3rd-4th rounder for him, we must take it and run when the time comes.

Matheson, like Guhle before him, should not be playing on his offside as it makes him a worse player but those are the cards we're dealt at the moment. I expect him to be moved at the deadline and hopefully we can have a RD replace him either in that deal or another.
Savard has slowed down but he's still our top 3 defensive defenseman. Only now because X has taken a giant step, he's down to the 3rd best.

Carrier wont displace Guhle as our top RD but we are losing out on Guhle offense.

Let's see which carrier we get. There was a short term Carrier that could pinch as a top 4 but there is no version of Carrier as a permanent top 4. If he was, he wouldn't be worth a Barron.

We really need Mailman to pull an X in developing. And of course for Rein to heal and come in by the latest, next Xmas.

I'm getting two AHL games and going to the Feb 7 game. The ast game i saw, Mailman made me cry with two easy blunders. Not suprised because it happens to young players. Let's see the next 3....

I think Xhekaj is on the bottom pairing no matter what
Think whatever you want...it's not what SMarty is thinking. One can easily tell by his time and use...
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad