Alex Ovechkin vs Evgeni Malkin

whos better all time alex ovechkin or evgeni malkin

  • alex ovechkin

    Votes: 22 81.5%
  • evgeni malkin

    Votes: 5 18.5%

  • Total voters
    27

Gorskyontario

Registered User
Feb 18, 2024
532
442
You should check your information before you spout false data.

2009
Malkin: 36
Crosby: 31

2016
Malkin: 18(in 1 less game)
Crosby: 19

2017
Malkin: 28
Crosby: 27

You're right, Crosby had a 1 point lead when having an additional game in 2016, Malkin still carried him.

Ovechkin has two more Hart trophies and 355 more goals...and he didn't have the elite talent around him that Malkin did

Ovechkin played on an offensively elite team nearly his entire career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,396
6,156
Visit site
2009
Malkin: 36
Crosby: 31

2016
Malkin: 18(in 1 less game)
Crosby: 19

2017
Malkin: 28
Crosby: 27

You're right, Crosby had a 1 point lead when having an additional game in 2016, Malkin still carried him.
If Malkin "carried" Crosby in 2016 (he didn't) then Crosby carried Malkin in 2017 (he didn't).

And Crosby carried Malkin to the SCF in 2009 if we use your definition.
 

Gorskyontario

Registered User
Feb 18, 2024
532
442
If Malkin "carried" Crosby in 2016 (he didn't) then Crosby carried Malkin in 2017 (he didn't).

And Crosby carried Malkin to the SCF in 2009 if we use your definition.

Malkin was the better playoff performer in all their stanley cup runs(except 2008 when they lost).

Crosby had 2 or 3 points in the 2009 finals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

Nathaniel Skywalker

DIG IN!!! RiGHT NOW!!!
Oct 18, 2013
14,145
5,779
2009
Malkin: 36
Crosby: 31

2016
Malkin: 18(in 1 less game)
Crosby: 19

2017
Malkin: 28
Crosby: 27

You're right, Crosby had a 1 point lead when having an additional game in 2016, Malkin still carried him.



Ovechkin played on an offensively elite team nearly his entire career.
Lol you left out the fact that Malkin had 1 more point in with having an additional game in 2017. All in all crosby scored 77 points in the 3 cup wins and Malkin scored 82. This is with crosby taking the number 1 defensive units and being far better in the dot etc.

Malkin was the better playoff performer in all their stanley cup runs(except 2008 when they lost).

Crosby had 2 or 3 points in the 2009 finals.
Crosby also led the 2017 finals in scoring. Fun fact crosby had more points in 3/4 finals
 

Gorskyontario

Registered User
Feb 18, 2024
532
442
Lol you left out the fact that Malkin had 1 more point in with having an additional game in 2017. All in all crosby scored 77 points in the 3 cup wins and Malkin scored 82. This is with crosby taking the number 1 defensive units and being far better in the dot etc.

In 2017 I distinctly remember Crosby matching up(and to his credit, dominating) an old Joe Thoenton. Not exactly the 'hardest match up'.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
14,208
11,027
Of course it does. Which isn't to say that availability and longevity should NOT be valued, of course it should. But this poster militantly opposed "per game" stuff, until it favors Ovechkin. Militantly opposes "fantasy", until "adjusted" stats favor Ovechkin. It's just all buffet style logic, thus my tongue-in-cheek comment haha

That is blatantly false.

There is nothing inconsistent about what I’ve said regarding ppg or adjusted stats.
 

Zine

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
12,294
2,332
At their absolute best Malkin was better. But Geno could never maintain that level of play for any considerable length of time.
All time it's Ovechkin, rather easily.
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
10,937
7,925
Brampton, ON
At their absolute best Malkin was better. But Geno could never maintain that level of play for any considerable length of time.
All time it's Ovechkin, rather easily.

Even this is debatable. Malkin was extremely good from 2008 to 2009 and in 2012, but was he better than Ovechkin from 2008 to 2010? Even in the playoffs, I'm not sure he played better than Ovechkin in the '09 playoffs. Obviously he had a deeper and longer playoff run.
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,094
14,360
He scored 36 points, and won the cup and conn smythe so It's pretty clear he outplayed Ovechkin heavily.
This is pretty illustrative of part of the problem that people have comparing players but using the playoffs. Did Malkin outplay Ovehhkin heavily... or did his team just advance two rounds further than Ovechkins's did? Through two rounds Malkin had 19 points in 13 games, Ovechkin had 21 points in 14 games. Malkin was second on his team in scoring, Ovechkin was first. They actually played each other in a seven game series, and Ovechkin led the series in scoring. Malkin went on to absolutely torch a mediocre Carolina team in the conference finals and led Pittsburgh against Detroit, when Detroit put all its eggs in the Crosby basket.

Credit to Malkin for excelling in the final two rounds, it was a great playoff performance and certainly one of the best of this century. You can definitely suggest that Malkin outplayed Ovechkin, mainly due to how he excelled in the oportunity afforded him. I don't know that anyone could conclude that he heavily outplayed Ovechkin though. He got more games in. Ovechkin was excellent in those playoffs.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,132
11,164
Not nearly as impactful as Kessel, Crosby, or Letang at the very least.

Signed,
Every Pens Fan

If I remember correctly it was Letang who played best the first 2 rounds, Crosby the final 2 and Kessel led in scoring feasting on weaker matchups. Crosby’s Conn Smythe may have been a relatively weak one but no one on his team deserved it over him that year.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,396
6,156
Visit site
Even this is debatable. Malkin was extremely good from 2008 to 2009 and in 2012, but was he better than Ovechkin from 2008 to 2010? Even in the playoffs, I'm not sure he played better than Ovechkin in the '09 playoffs. Obviously he had a deeper and longer playoff run.

You could argue that Malkin, at his best, brought as much offense individually as Ovechkin while raising the level of play of his linemates, usually mediocre/borderline Top 6 level, and being an effective 2-way player (or at least being a contributing player on the defensive side as Ovechkin was given the greenlight to cheat). Ovechkin was effective with his physicality but that also was because he was given the greenlight to hit anything he wanted with no regard for defensive positioning.

The only thing he really lacked over a peak Ovechkin was the ability to score a goal at any given time and the Crosby factor is also a reasonable consideration.

It is a bit of a apples to oranges comparison.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad