Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 33,821
- 37,138
It would seem a ton of our posters, would not know Bobby Smith.yeesh.
Bobby Smith was pretty instrumental in the '86 cup win.
No good fact; I own a Smith Nescafe coffee mug that dates back to 1988. I also own a Stephane Richer Nescafe mug, which I refer to as my kids.yeesh.
Bobby Smith was pretty instrumental in the '86 cup win.
You need something to give you back a good feeling.
How long before your next trip to the Dominican? Spoke to a guy who came back from there 2 weeks ago and loved it. Stayed 10 days, bought a Sunwing package, all inclusive $3000 for 2 people. He used $50 US in $1 for tips.
Um, I don't recognize the username but I like it15 ?
Guy will be out of here in 2 seasons.
Bobby Rousseau used to wear that jersey ? hum, maybe i should have asked to Oldgregyeesh.
Bobby Smith was pretty instrumental in the '86 cup win.
Robert RousseauIs he the next Bobby Smith? Or PA Parenteau?
Somewhere around 3.1M per............the term will be 3-4 years....
Newhook needs to become a 70+ point player for this trade to not be a total waste.
Claude Larose on his second stintAnd, Rejean Houle....
70+ point is a bit much (no one on the roster has proven to be able to hit that yet) but I think cheap 50-60 points while being responsible defensively/good complementary player would be okay.And? Why is a 5'10 2nd line winger worth giving up valuable assets for?
Zuccarello, Perron, Zucker, Johansson were all cheap FA.
FLA had to pay Vegas to take Marchessault. Ditto McCann from the Leafs/Pens. Eberle let go for free also (who the hell did NYI even protect up front?).
Vegas had to pay us to take Tatar and Dadonov, they were negative assets.
Granlund, Rakell, Arvidsson and Burakovsky cost a late 2nd. Bjorkstrand even less.
You could throw a rock in the free agent pool every offseason and accidentally hit one of these guys. The supply is way way way more than the demand. Why trade essentially two late firsts for this type of player?
Vancouver is willing to pay teams to take Garland off their hands right now. What does Newhook do better?
Newhook needs to become a 70+ point player for this trade to not be a total waste.
Other contracts needing extension in 2 years:I'm curious to see if it's close to Dach. Not much talk about a 6 year deal. Most of us think it's 2-4 years. I personally like staggering contracts as much as you can. I don't like the 3 year option.
Would 6 years at $3.75M be fair? If it's 4 years, I'd try to get it down to around $3M. He doesn't have much pedigree as Dach had.
Last time we won the cup? Our team was loaded with players like that.70+ point is a bit much (no one on the roster has proven to be able to hit that yet) but I think cheap 50-60 points while being responsible defensively/good complementary player would be okay.
Most teams are. I want to say no team with a player who has scored more than 100 points has won the cup in the like a decade or something. Cap era means one must spread out the offense and play strong team defense.Last time we won the cup? Our team was loaded with players like that.
CoursonMost teams are. I want to say no team with a player who has scored more than 100 points has won the cup in the like a decade or something. Cap era means one must spread out the offense and play strong team defense.
Man I miss those teams. Work your ass off type players that would block a shot with their face to win, while also contributing offensively.Courson
Keane
McPhee
Carbo
Lebeau
Probably missing a few…
Oh don't think this organization is anywhere near a cup LOL.Last time we won the cup? Our team was loaded with players like that.
We aren’t “loaded” yet… I never suggested that we were in contention. What the hell is going on with this forum? Seriously!Oh don't think this organization is anywhere near a cup LOL.