Yup I'm not sure what the thinking there was
In the middle of this 20-4-2 stretch I feel we haven't been talking about Kerfoot as much as we should. He has 24 points in 33 games, a 60 point pace! He also has 17 EV assists which leads the team and is 2nd in EV points behind Tavares. He does all this while being the most versatile depth piece we have. He's usually a 2LW, but can play 3C and even jump up to 1RW as we saw last night.
What a year he's having. Arguably the most under-appreciated piece we have on the roster right now
Playing with the cap calculator:
- subtract Mrazek
- subtract Holl or Dermott
- subtract Ritchie
- re-sign Sandin and Liljegren in the vicinity of 1.5 to 2 per player
- fill out the roster with ELCs and league min players
- sign Campbell long term @ $6M aav, keep Kerfoot
Nobody is giving Campbell 6 not when there is a guy in New York putting up almost the exact same numbers at a younger age for 5.6
Jack isn't getting 6
If Jack wins the Vezina (probably even if he's nominated) then IMO he's pretty much a lock to get 6. That guy in NY, that's one example but have a look at some of the guys that signed for 5 million last summer and compare them to Jack, you might end up concluding that Jack might even get 7-8 million.
You’re a couple of weeks early with your Burns quotes Laddie."The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry."
Sounds like you're just daring Dubas at this point.I love Jack I do, there is no chance in hell he gets 7-8
I'm confident he won't get 6 there is NO chance he hits 7
If Jack wins the Vezina (probably even if he's nominated) then IMO he's pretty much a lock to get 6. That guy in NY, that's one example but have a look at some of the guys that signed for 5 million last summer and compare them to Jack, you might end up concluding that Jack might even get 7-8 million.
If Jack wins the Vezina (probably even if he's nominated) then IMO he's pretty much a lock to get 6. That guy in NY, that's one example but have a look at some of the guys that signed for 5 million last summer and compare them to Jack, you might end up concluding that Jack might even get 7-8 million.
Sounds like you're just daring Dubas at this point.
He's almost 30 and has a career high of less than 30 games played in a single season prior to this year Getting 7+ mil would be unprecedented for a guy like that, can't see it happening.
Guys like Lehner or Varlamov offer fairly consistent comparisons for the range he will get assuming he has a strong finish to his season and playoffs
Jacob Markstrom, at the same age as Campbell right now, received 6x6 after a season with playoff success and was 4th in Vezina voting. He also had two full years as a primary starter before that which helped his case.
Linus Ullmark is 1.5 years younger than Campbell and signed a year earlier than him too. Ullmark's age in his contract year will be the same as Campbell's in the first year of his new deal. That has a lot to do with Ullmark's money (on top of Boston being desperate).
Ben Bishop received the equivalent of 5.5 x 6 on a 82.5 mill cap at the same age as Campbell in UFA, but he had 3 straight seasons as a starter with two being Vezina caliber + a Stanley Cup Finals run with a .921 save percentage + another serious playoff run with almost a .940 save percentage. Campbell has zero playoff success.
Lehner received 5x5 with a larger resume and signing at a year younger.
Campbell could have an amazing year, but it is still only one year where he has handled a starter's workload and he is 30. The market is clear for those kinds of guys, even the Vezina-caliber ones, and it is certainly not 7-8 mill. Even 6 mill, unless he is seriously sacrificing term, is probably out of reach from any cap-strapped team (there may always be a crappy team with cap space willing to overpay for him). We will see what happens if he gets the Vezina and the Conn Smythe.
I wouldn't think so either but no one thought he would pay Marner even close to what he did.I know Dubas likes to spend money but even he isn't paying Jack 7
I think Dubas has learned from the Marner fiasco, he took some hits in the public for that deal and was voted GM agents would most want to deal with. 90% managers would work to change that reputation. Letting Hyman walk is an example and refusing to help Holland with the contract is another example of him shifting his image a bit.I wouldn't think so either but no one thought he would pay Marner even close to what he did.
It'll be interesting.
It's obvious isn't it?
You can't hand Campbell the job because at the time there wasn't enough sample size to prove he could do it.
You can't give Hutchinson the backup because he can't do it.
And Woll wasn't getting the backup because he had 0 games of NHL experience.
They made the right move with the wrong guy.
Should have been Halak or Holtby
Yes I'm sure he's learned from his mistakes.I think Dubas has learned from the Marner fiasco, he took some hits in the public for that deal and was voted GM agents would most want to deal with. 90% managers would work to change that reputation. Letting Hyman walk is an example and refusing to help Holland with the contract is another example of him shifting his image a bit.
Mrazek Ritchie and one of Holl/Dermott is enough to bring back the band (soup, soup, Kase) and fill out the 21/22nd roster spots and back up goalie with 1m ish contracts. Can’t see kerf going unless they want to make a significant additionThe player the Leafs really have to move to sign Campbell is Mrazek.
Nobody is giving Campbell 6 not when there is a guy in New York putting up almost the exact same numbers at a younger age for 5.6
Jack isn't getting 6