I would hope so because that would mean no victim eitherIt is going to be hilarious when these guys are proven innocent.
He was given bad advice and told it was normal he didn't need to sign his offer, when in reality he did need toI think it's going to be hard for Formenton to make a case here. There isn't a well established precedent of what an NHL agent is supposed to achieve when the client is an alleged rapist. And the latter is going to be the ultimate reason for his contract negotiations and career to go in the direction it went. I think for him to succeed he would have to essentially prove otherwise, and that doesn't seem very likely.
And that's before even getting into the fact that without a valid active contract between him and the agent, there wasn't any real obligation from the agent to do anything (other than maybe relay an offer if any such offer came his way).
The thread should have ended with this postIt is terrible when people get taken advantage of by others and it's not their fault and they don't want it to happen, isn't it?
Except his case is built around a claim of future earnings which would have absolutely been impacted by just the allegations, not to mention how they would have been impacted if he is found guilty.I know people don't like the guy, but that shouldn't cloud whether he has a case here.
He's innocent until proven guilty with the rape case. He has every right to sue the agent because of how they handled his career after the rape allegations. They don't have the right to misrepresent him just because he might've raped someone. Bad guys are represented too, and we don't even know for sure he's a bad guy. Time will tell about that.
His claims don't sound frivolous. Doubt he gets all the money he's suing for, but depending on the details he may have a case. I doubt it goes to trial. They'll probably just settle for some small amount.
OkI am 53 and I give as good as I get.
So I know who to write a lawsuit making it looking like I am the second coming
Formenton was an AHL-level player. Top-six or bust was what I heard about him, and he wasn't nearly talented enough to be top-six. So, where the hell is twenty million for future earnings coming from? The AHL doesn't pay that kind of money. Europe, to my knowledge, wouldn't pay him this amount of money. So, where the hell is he getting twenty million?
You couldn’t be more wrong with this assessment.
Alex Formenton was one of the fastest players in the league, but he also played with a bit of a physical chip and a ferocity on the forecheck, which made him extremely valuable as a bottom six guy. He wasn’t afraid to mix it up around the net and play as a bit of a pest.
He was a fearsome weapon on the PK because if he chipped the defenceman on the line he was off to the races.
Formenton was an exciting prospect for Ottawa as a crucial piece toward a future third line that would have been absolute hell to play against in Formenton-Pinto-Grieg.
The fact that he appears to be a terrible human being doesn’t change his skillset or what he did bring to the table to the Senators when he was there.
HIs final year in the NHL proves he could play. But as for being a terrible human? I agree he is crazy. If he truly believes in the last two years he could have made 20 million. But my guess this lawsuit will proceed after the court case and my guess is that if they are found not guilty he will use it as ammo in this case. He is going on the offensive and it will be interesting to see what happens here.
Worked construction for a month and is already over it lmao
I know what the tactics are. I just think 20 million is especially frivolous, and suing his agent for his own stupid decisions is even more frivolous. There's not a chance in the nine levels of hell he would've sniffed 1,000 NHL games. No way he could've earned even half of that. Especially after being indicted.
He was a tweener at best. Speed and chipping in occasional offense doesn't mean shit without any defense or physicality for a third/fourth line player - and don't tell me Formenton could play defense well or he was physical when he wasn't either.
AHL/NHL tweener at f***ing best. Especially considering that he's been charged with f***ing sexual assault. It was going to come out anyway, and it did. He should've accepted the contract he was given. He should've listened to that f***ing little bit of conscience (if he even had it) that said, "Hey, sexual assault is f***ing wrong." He should've listened to his f***ing agent that he's now suing for his own f***ing mistakes.
Forgive me for not having any sympathy or any positive feelings for him or his career - or the careers of the accused, for that matter, which is what I stated in my answer to you.
I wasn’t commenting on this particular case but rather the poster’s scouting report.
He’s allowed to sue anyone he wants, if he expects any kind of sympathy I suspect it will be lacking unless he is vindicated which seems pretty unlikely at this point.
The point is that trying to argue he wasn't an NHL caliber player is pretty stupid. He obviously was. There are valid reasons an NHL team might not want him and I think that will mitigate his claims for 20.5M and might even lose him the case against Newport if it went all the way,
Alex Formenton was one of the fastest players in the league, but he also played with a bit of a physical chip and a ferocity on the forecheck, which made him extremely valuable as a bottom six guy. He wasn’t afraid to mix it up around the net and play as a bit of a pest.
If that was the cause, they could also have terminated the contract. What was listed was it wasn't renewed. Question is by which side wasn't it renewed. Was it the player or them? Was it them who didn't want to but were helping him "under the table", or was it him that didn't want to, but given the case couldn't get another and since he knew them he asked them and they had sympathy for him. That will be interesting to see.Newport was trying to protect Formenton and help make this go away, at some point it became clear this wasn’t going away and he was going to be a radioactive so they would obviously want to distance themselves. It’s not a stretch that a court would rule there’s enough to warrant a trial to determine whether they breached in their duties to a client at some point.
If that is the standard norm after having a reasonably good season, its not bad advice. He didn't need to sign it, and let's just agree to your argument that if he did need to because of the case coming out, he wouldn't get a new contract after that one. So at best its a one year deal.He was given bad advice and told it was normal he didn't need to sign his offer, when in reality he did need to