I would hope so because that would mean no victim eitherIt is going to be hilarious when these guys are proven innocent.
He was given bad advice and told it was normal he didn't need to sign his offer, when in reality he did need toI think it's going to be hard for Formenton to make a case here. There isn't a well established precedent of what an NHL agent is supposed to achieve when the client is an alleged rapist. And the latter is going to be the ultimate reason for his contract negotiations and career to go in the direction it went. I think for him to succeed he would have to essentially prove otherwise, and that doesn't seem very likely.
And that's before even getting into the fact that without a valid active contract between him and the agent, there wasn't any real obligation from the agent to do anything (other than maybe relay an offer if any such offer came his way).
The thread should have ended with this postIt is terrible when people get taken advantage of by others and it's not their fault and they don't want it to happen, isn't it?
Except his case is built around a claim of future earnings which would have absolutely been impacted by just the allegations, not to mention how they would have been impacted if he is found guilty.I know people don't like the guy, but that shouldn't cloud whether he has a case here.
He's innocent until proven guilty with the rape case. He has every right to sue the agent because of how they handled his career after the rape allegations. They don't have the right to misrepresent him just because he might've raped someone. Bad guys are represented too, and we don't even know for sure he's a bad guy. Time will tell about that.
His claims don't sound frivolous. Doubt he gets all the money he's suing for, but depending on the details he may have a case. I doubt it goes to trial. They'll probably just settle for some small amount.