The problem with Rivet and Peters isn't that they have hot takes. It's that they proudly don't do their homework and often have no idea what they are talking about. If they were better informed and had controversial opinions, I'd be fine with that. They also repeat themselves ad nauseum. Rivet sometimes makes good general points -- usually related to the need for role players and the importance of team bonding. I'll give him a little credit for that. But he also has so little knowledge about so many players, advanced stats, salary cap issues, CBA rules, prospects, etc. Not to mention the fact that a hockey "professional" won't take the time to even try to correctly pronounce people's names. As he would say, it's "extremely irritating."