were not as impressive to me as enstrom was. enstrom stepped in and immediately became the best defenseman in his division.
and while pietrangelo and myers both played quite well in their rookie seasons, they just didn't have the same composure i see in larsson. not to mention both of them were older.
What you see may not always be what's right.
A lot of Rangers fans were obsessed with MDZ's rookie season. The truth is that, he was playing very average even strength and rode a hot powerplay in the beginning of the year to stat pad. He didn't have a great rookie year as indicated, but a ton of us fans were too biased to admit it.
Myers won the rookie of the year, he became a #1 guy immediately on a playoff team. Pietrangelo had a dominant rookie year, his defensive was on par with the league's best towards the end of the year.
Larsson will probably get 20-25ish points, I doubt he's gonna have a better rookie year than the players mentioned above. Larsson won't contend with the rookie of the year award like the other two were, unless he gets on a hot point streak. There are also other rookies playing out of their mind right now, Nugent-Hopkins PPG player, Landeskog top 3 in shots, hits, Couturier is starting to heat up, etc.
Enstrom while it's a great accomplishment that he became 'the top defender in his division', it certainly is debatable. Mike Green also had a ton of points, playing in all situations for a playoff Capitals team. Other than that yeah, but who were the other elite defenders in the division,.... Frankstiek Kaberle?