I hope you're not posting this because someone said he's not a top 6 player on a good team. That comment has kind of been marginalized by this point. People/fans/teams are interested in him because they know he's a good player.
Fair enough. Like I said, just a point of reference of what exactly he has accomplished in the last 3 years.
At 50% retention for 2 playoff runs, that prospect better be pretty good. Otherwise, it needs to be a 1st (and the Ducks can take back a short-term cap dump, too.) Considering you say you aren't interested in him, I'm assuming you won't like that valuation.
What about this: the Avs 1st in 2023 + Eric Johnson. 50% retention (for Henrique). If Henrique falls below .50 ppg during the 2nd season, you cede your 2024 2nd round pick to the Avs?
It's not a bad offer, though I would not be willing to do the conditional pick (maybe I'd be willing to make it a 4th instead of a 2nd, but I honestly don't think this pick is necessary).
Does it matter? The only rule is no picks that are conditional on re/signing, no?
The Neal-Lucic trade had a condition based on total amount of goals scored. I imagine PPG is also possible.
I’m not saying I hate it. I’m just curious.
Yes but in that case isn’t it usually about a pick getting bumped up? I’ve rarely seen clauses where the seller has to pay back or pick gets pushed backwards it would be an interesting precedent I like it.
How can you call it bias when I’m basing my stance on his stats?
