he isn’t a player you give up a 1st for….evrn st 50%.
on a good team he isn’t a top 6 or evrn top 9 player.
then that extra year in this tight cap world scare off teams even more.
If your valuation of him was correct (not even a top 9 player), then I agree he's not worth a first. But I think that's a bizarre valuation/assessment of Henrique and where he plays on a contending team. He's a productive middle 6 forward who can play anywhere in the lineup and in lots of situations including PK and brings strong leadership intangibles. Super valuable to a cup contending team where depth is a huge factor with the only downside being his cap hit, which the ducks can address through retention or taking back salary.
That's what you've said already. But it's not necessary to complain about which half of the first round the 1sts will be. That's a given.
Are people overvaluing 1sts or are you going too far in valuing him something close to Giroux? Keep in mind, the appeal of Henrique is cost relative to other options. I think the extra year appeals to some but not everyone agrees.
In terms of the bolded, maybe that was a "given" for you, but not for lots of others. And its wasn't a complaint, but rather pointing out the value (or overvaluing) of a low first round pick.
And I have no idea how you're concluding I or anyone else is valuing Henrique "something close" to Giroux. Ignoring for now that Giroux had a full NMC and was a pure rental, and is older, Giroux (with retention) returned a 2024 or 2025 first (which right now might be higher than expected), a third and a pretty decent NHL ready prospect (Tippett). That's a lot more than a low first which is the ask for Henrique (with 1.5 years of retention).