Did Gmbm pick Trotz? I don't recall if there were any stories of back room discussions about who would coach the Capitals prior to Trotz and Gmbm both being announced for their new positions on the same day.
Trotz, like the Caps, had playoff issues. It was a step up as far as regular season performance goes and the results bear that out with two consecutive President's Trophies. I don't think we're going to argue it was a downgrade or even a lateral move from Oates.
And Boudreau is struggling abroad with his 2nd team since the Capitals. Same problems with the playoffs. So apparently there's a disconnect somewhere at the top when it comes to the concept of a coach that will march this team to the Cup. Maybe it's Patrick, or Ted.
Gmbm addressed team needs as he saw them based on what was available. He made some big moves that were not in McPhee's playbook. They may not all have worked out, but some did, and he generally got the players that the roster lacked.
The real question has been whether or not Trotz is a fit for the roster, and if the roster is mismatched. It's almost like we have a Frankenteam that's a product of committee thinking. And IMO they've been trying to find a way to split the difference since they lost their "heavy team" identity from 2 years ago.
IMO they should either go "full Trotz" and re-emphasize the heavy game or find a different coach and go in a new direction. Whichever they choose they have to match the roster to the coaching style.