if Schmidt isn't taken by Vegas I think getting rid of Orpik should be a big priority. No point in keeping him around at the cost of Oshie to play him on the third pairing. However if Schmidt is taken it's still worth it to get rid of him, but something would have to happen with our defense.
I'd prefer Vegas took Grubeaur so we could have an easier time trading Orpik.
Nemeth has played 108 NHL games including just 40 this year on a team that has a horrible defense. At 25 years old I would say that he would never play for the Caps. They don't need Niemi or his cap hit or throwing away cap space buying him out.
My view is that Orpik can be at minimum given away to a team with a young defense and some cap space. Should it be a playoff missing team, they make a profit by trading him at the deadline.
I just have a tough time seeing another team taking on Orpik's contract without being compensated for it. It's not even as if he is cheap in actual salary either, so teams with internal budgets aren't likely to want him as a means of reaching the cap floor. My original idea was Grubauer and Orpik for Henri Kiviaho (goaltender who meets expansion requirements) and a pick which would get the full $11M off the books, but Stars fans didn't seem to be terribly interested.
Obviously there are concerns about losing Schmidt in the expansion draft, but I am not convinced that exposing Grubauer would prevent that.
At this point I think losing Schmidt in the expansion draft is more likely than losing Grubauer. There are plenty of capable exposed goalies, while I think the D will end up being much thinner.
Hey guys! Looking forward to your matchup against the Pens! Good hockey ahead
Just curious, would you think if your team loses in 2nd round that you'll enter a *significant* retool.
Don't be harsh on me, would it be possible to work with :
Evgeny Kuznetsov
Andre Burakovsky
Brooks Orpik (50% retained)
Max Pacioretty
Nathan Beaulieu (you probably will lose Alzner + D to Vegas. Beaulieu would help on the left for cheap and is decently young)
Tomas Plekanec (50% retained)
God no. This team needs all of the youth it can get. It doesn't seem to know how to develop them fully but that's another matter.
Sure enough, they've done a good job on defense and goaltender. Reirden and Korn are legit at what they do. At forward, though, not so much. Johansson and Kuznetsov have improved but they still have weak depth with no end in sight in terms of legit internal upgrades. Wilson has improved and is getting bigger minutes but he hasn't improved enough to warrant consistent scoring-line time. Burakovsky still plays like a stupid junior player. Vrana was never a strong organizational fit and still gets cracked down on for not being enough of a game-breaker in spite of it. Organizationally they don't seem to know how to crank out depth forwards (or smart two-way forwards period). Their forward depth isn't producing at all so far. They brought in Eller and Connolly and they've mostly been ghosts.Still going with that narrative even after the growth we're seeing with Orlov, Schmidt and to a lesser extent Wilson? They've apparently done a great job with Grubauer, too.
Hey guys! Looking forward to your matchup against the Pens! Good hockey ahead
Just curious, would you think if your team loses in 2nd round that you'll enter a *significant* retool.
Don't be harsh on me, would it be possible to work with :
Evgeny Kuznetsov
Andre Burakovsky
Brooks Orpik (50% retained)
Max Pacioretty
Nathan Beaulieu (you probably will lose Alzner + D to Vegas. Beaulieu would help on the left for cheap and is decently young)
Tomas Plekanec (50% retained)
Hey guys! Looking forward to your matchup against the Pens! Good hockey ahead
Just curious, would you think if your team loses in 2nd round that you'll enter a *significant* retool.
Don't be harsh on me, would it be possible to work with :
Evgeny Kuznetsov
Andre Burakovsky
Brooks Orpik (50% retained)
Max Pacioretty
Nathan Beaulieu (you probably will lose Alzner + D to Vegas. Beaulieu would help on the left for cheap and is decently young)
Tomas Plekanec (50% retained)
Still going with that narrative even after the growth we're seeing with Orlov, Schmidt and to a lesser extent Wilson? They've apparently done a great job with Grubauer, too.
Evgeny Kuznetsov
Andre Burakovsky
Brooks Orpik (50% retained)
Max Pacioretty
Nathan Beaulieu (you probably will lose Alzner + D to Vegas. Beaulieu would help on the left for cheap and is decently young)
Tomas Plekanec (50% retained)
None of this matters until this core of losers are gone. Coaches come and go and its still the same. Its the players that are the problem.
You can make the statement that Golden Knights are closer to a cup then this team. They are not burden contracts of players that will never get it done.
The best thing that could happen to this team is OV going the Russia to play. It will never be fixed until its started over. Adding a few moving parts to this core does nothing.
Let's try to keep it together as fans until we're actually eliminated.
I've got a long winded Ovechkin/Backstrom post brewing myself, but the patient isn't dead yet.
The Caps' management need to stop and think what the hell they want to be as an organization going forward.
Do they want to be a skilled team? A heavy/cycling team? A fast/energy team?
After they decide on their philosophy, they need to re-evaluate if Trotz is the right man to build a Stanley Cup favourite team using that specific playstyle. Then, retool the core accordingly.
This "hybrid" playstyle has been complete garbage in the playoffs. Too many coin-flip games as the team can barely establish any dominance over the opponents. The Caps were closer to winning the Cup when they had the "heavy hockey" concept than they are right now.
Just my 2c.