Post-Game Talk: A successful season?

MessierII

Registered User
Aug 10, 2011
28,641
18,158
I'm sorry to be negative but I can't feel good about this. Yes we beat Calgary and made it to round 3. Yes the experience is good for the group. But even a Hurculean effort by our top guys (even RNH was phenomenal) couldn't mask the gaping holes on the back end and it net. Everyone knew this coming into the season, and it was exposed this round. A competent GM with that much cap space surely could have done so much better than what we've been trotting out back there.
To be fair it’s tough when your #1 is playing at about 30%. Imagine Makar that hurt for the Avs how different this series would be. Out of 3 players we could least afford to have hurt 2 were badly hurt.
 

Ritchie Valens

Registered User
Sep 24, 2007
29,882
43,081
To think the Blues, so far, gave the Avs the most trouble. 5 seconds away from OT and a chance to force a game 7.

Full credit to the Avs though, they are rolling. 12-2 so far.

The league and especially the officiating can deep throat a cactus thought.
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
49,635
63,985
Islands in the stream.
Special shout out to Kane, and Kassian, two players that understood what the Oilers needed more of in this series and at least tried to get some bad blood flowing. The Oilers, after the Flames series were having trouble dialing up motivating hate for this series and opponent. Both Kane and Kass were feeding that, but alas too late. I do feel the AV's responded dirty in this game in response to Kane on Kadri, and I think it got the AV's off their mental focus in this one. We should won, and there should have been more calls on the AV's infractions and undisciplined play.

So much learning experiences, we missed opportunities to get dialed in in this series. Felt the team really approached most of the series the wrong way.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
51,107
42,730
Seriously, take a step back if you are going to go into full negative nancy mode. We gave them all they could handle in games 1 and 4.
The Avs played bad in game 1 and game 4 and still found a way to win. That’s literally my point. The Avs are good enough that they can mostly play a shit game and just decide to win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porkleaker

syz

[1, 5, 6, 14]
Jul 13, 2007
30,524
16,097
Called a hip injury as soon as he went off the ice when he got hurt.
 

Connor McConnor

Registered User
Nov 22, 2017
5,522
6,605
It was a good season for sure, we ran into a team that was better from top to bottom.

We didn’t lose this series because of MacK and Makar we lost because of guys like Compher and Nichuskin outplaying our bottom 6.

Oh and Mike Smith showing he’s 60 years old.

Would have liked us to push them to atleast 6 and I think the games were pretty close where that was a possibility but overall, what more could you have expected from this flawed roster.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
37,998
18,918
It was a great playoff run for the Oilers. Beating the Flames was awesome,but it wasn’t our time for ultimate glory yet. Huge props to the avalanche, they were so strong in this series.
They've suffered a ton as well. They've come into playoffs and failed many times as well and with much higher expectations than our team has. Their core is older as well aside from Makar.
 

Weitz

Registered User
Sep 23, 2014
2,786
1,162
I still can’t believe we have 4.3 million in dead cap next year.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
51,107
42,730
I would say top 15 goalie and a hard to play against RHD. Re-sign Kane.

I would be thrilled.
Fair. I’d say if your top pairing is Nurse - Ceci, you don’t have a good defence. That’s a real good second pair though (not a knock on Ceci)
 

Ritchie Valens

Registered User
Sep 24, 2007
29,882
43,081
The sweep and watching Colorado celebrate a conference title win in their barn will hopefully not just light a fire under their asses, it better ignite a f***ing rocket.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad