ijuka
Registered User
- May 14, 2016
- 23,628
- 17,357
Because your facts are ridiculous. It's as simple as that.
Ridiculous? They were 100% the truth, straight from the official site's box score.
Because your facts are ridiculous. It's as simple as that.
Really significant sample size you pulled up there.Ridiculous? They were 100% the truth, straight from the official site's box score.
Meaningless?This entire tournament... I mean, it's the whole sample size. I'd love if I had more matches to work with but it is what it is.
Look here. You can't compare the starts Markström have had with the ones Lundqvist had.Ridiculous? They were 100% the truth, straight from the official site's box score.
On Swedish television, Russia needs to do something different as what they do does bot work in the offensive, but the bench/coach does not provide it.
Look here. You can't compare the starts Markström have had with the ones Lundqvist had.
How many quality chances have Markström faced so far during his ice time? Two, maybe? How many breakaways, oddman rushes and quality chances did Lundqvist face? A hell of a lot more than two.
It's ridiculous to compare the two just with numbers, with a three game sample. It's a non-existant sample if you want to talk statistics.
And then someone chimes in and adds: "Watch some Rangers games." Well, I've just watched a couple of hundred of them. Lundqvist just happens to be the most consistent goaltender the last decade. That apparently means nothing, because he allowed alot of goals in meaningless exhibition games.
Markstrom had some juicy rebounds and was out of position atleast once.
Russia can't break through Swedens defense, like not even a little.