Do we really have 30 shots on goal?
This team has no finish. Frightening.
Maybe it's time to bench Lundqvist. They're a completely different team with Talbot in net. How does one explain that?
Also, why is it that this team can not make it past one game over .500 haha
You take that level headed analysis and objectivism, and you get the hell out.
We have no place for it here.
Doubtful.We're going to be regretting Lundqvist's contract extension for a long time.
take away that C
Callahan is ****ing useless
Then
Why
Cant
We
Score.
Bobrovsky stopped a breakaway. It is humanly possible.
My point is that its ok to be critical/objective about Hnak's play. Like i said im a hank fan and he has had a tremendous career BUT this year he is average at best. Look im not absolvign teh defense BUT you cant always blame them. Talbot has had defensive breakdowsn as well and he has done greatYou give prime, grade-a chances to NHL forwards, and they are going to bury them, on ANY NHL goalie. Watch NHL tonight every night around the league. Goals are scored in the same fashion every. single. night.
Hank already made a few huge saves this game, but its the continual defensive breakdowns on the previous two goals, and you're going to be down. It doesn't matter who you are.
What it be nice if he could save the breakaway, or the guy with a prime chance from 5 feet away? Of course. It's not like he's not trying, but those grade a chances are going to get buried. It's a fact. Every hockey player, and goalie knows this.
I didn't see the first goal but are we really crucifying Hank for letting in a breakaway and a snipe? By that logic Talbot let in a soft goal last game too.
Best post in the thread. I am glad you understand the game of hockey. Kudos.![]()
We're going to be regretting Lundqvist's contract extension for a long time.