GDT: #39 - 12/27/13 | New York Rangers @ Washington Capitals | 7:00 PM - MSG 2

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
How can people say Nash is bad? Really? The guy has had some injury problems and is struggling, sure he could maybe be sat and that is reasonable... But to say he's bad? Come on now. That's ignorant.

Oh boy, when I say bad, it means he's playing bad, not that he's a bad player. We all know he's got the world of talent behind him........but............he's bringing us nothing right now. Understand?
 
This year is one thing. Let's not over compensate and act like he was terrible last year. He was our best offensive player.

I seem to recall him disappearing in the playoffs. Maybe my memory is worse than I thought.

He has all the tools. Hands, size, speed but lacks commitment and drive. He doesn't play hungry. He lets the game come to him instead of imposing his will. We have seen glimpses of it but he seems to get disinterested or when his one move doesn't work throws his hands
Up and says oh well
 
Within one page Nash has gone from bad to mediocre to underperforming. If posters stop using so much hyperbole when expressing their opinions there would be hope in actually getting somewhere on the merits of the discussion.

Hank is the worst player I ever saws!
 
He's had a rough three weeks or so. BFD. He's 10x more skilled than any of our forwards outside of maybe Zucc. This is getting ridiculous.

Yes, your posts are getting ridiculous, 3 weeks in hockey of no play is a lifetime. Did anywhere in my post did I say bench the guy for the rest of the year????? You sit poor play and no effort for a game or two so it sinks in that his bad play will not be tolerated. Maybe I'm being a little rough on you, how old are you? As for someone replacing him, you bring someone in from the Wolf Pack and throw him a bone for a game or two. I can tell you one thing you'll get a lot more effort
 
How can people say Nash is bad? Really? The guy has had some injury problems and is struggling, sure he could maybe be sat and that is reasonable... But to say he's bad? Come on now. That's ignorant.

Welcome to HFNYR, where a player is only as good as his last 10 games!

But really though, Nash has been awful and there's a contingent who'd be happy to see him gone for a decent return.
 
Yes, your posts are getting ridiculous, 3 weeks in hockey of no play is a lifetime. Did anywhere in my post did I say bench the guy for the rest of the year????? You sit poor play and no effort for a game or two so it sinks in that his bad play will not be tolerated. Maybe I'm being a little rough on you, how old are you? As for someone replacing him, you bring someone in from the Wolf Pack and throw him a bone for a game or two. I can tell you one thing you'll get a lot more effort


Give me Hrivik for a game or two. Sit Nash
 
Old enough to comprehend the simple fact that sitting Hank and sitting Nash are not comparable situations. Unlike you. Replacing Nash with someone from the Wolf pack is honestly one of the dumbest ideas I have ever read in my entire life. And I've been here for three years, I've read some pretty dumb things. This might take the cake, though.
 
Old enough to comprehend the simple fact that sitting Hank and sitting Nash are not comparable situations. Unlike you. Replacing Nash with someone from the Wolf pack is honestly one of the dumbest ideas I have ever read in my entire life. And I've been here for three years, I've read some pretty dumb things. This might take the cake, though.

Everyone here should ignore this post because age is always important when having discussions.
 
Everyone here should ignore this post because age is always important when having discussions.

Your opinion doesn't matter if you didn't walk 3 miles to school, in the snow, uphill BOTH WAYS.

Damn whippersnappers. This generation I tell ye! No respect! Want everything handed to 'em!
 
Yes, your posts are getting ridiculous, 3 weeks in hockey of no play is a lifetime. Did anywhere in my post did I say bench the guy for the rest of the year????? You sit poor play and no effort for a game or two so it sinks in that his bad play will not be tolerated. Maybe I'm being a little rough on you, how old are you? As for someone replacing him, you bring someone in from the Wolf Pack and throw him a bone for a game or two. I can tell you one thing you'll get a lot more effort

>>Brings up age

>>Has "666" in his username



God I love the internet.
 
Old enough to comprehend the simple fact that sitting Hank and sitting Nash are not comparable situations. Unlike you. Replacing Nash with someone from the Wolf pack is honestly one of the dumbest ideas I have ever read in my entire life. And I've been here for three years, I've read some pretty dumb things. This might take the cake, though.

Dude, better ask your parents before you get on here to post with adults. So in your world you keep playing players who provide no effort to the cause? This is laughable, I guess we don't have to worry about you getting a coaching job anytime soon. In the world of sports you bench players who provide nothing hoping to create a spark and if that means letting someone else play (((a game or two))) you do that. Now go pour yourself a glass of milk before bed time.
 
Wow
Much tough
Such experience
Dude, better ask your parents before you get on here to post with adults. So in your world you keep playing players who provide no effort to the cause? This is laughable, I guess we don't have to worry about you getting a coaching job anytime soon. In the world of sports you bench players who provide nothing hoping to create a spark and if that means letting someone else play (((a game or two))) you do that. Now go pour yourself a glass of milk before bed time.
 
Old enough to comprehend the simple fact that sitting Hank and sitting Nash are not comparable situations. Unlike you. Replacing Nash with someone from the Wolf pack is honestly one of the dumbest ideas I have ever read in my entire life. And I've been here for three years, I've read some pretty dumb things. This might take the cake, though.

True, but the idea of letting Nash sit for a game isn't dumb, a clear signal that he needs to perform better.

That treatment has been a success, AV did the same thing to Zucc, Del Zotto...and now Hank. So why not Nash.
 
Dude, better ask your parents before you get on here to post with adults. So in your world you keep playing players who provide no effort to the cause? This is laughable, I guess we don't have to worry about you getting a coaching job anytime soon. In the world of sports you bench players who provide nothing hoping to create a spark and if that means letting someone else play (((a game or two))) you do that. Now go pour yourself a glass of milk before bed time.

Picking a fight with the wrong guy, man. This poster once made an entire genre of thread go away simply because he was sick of it.

They still tell legends of the OT Slayer. Some say he awaits for unwitting users to attempt to revive the OT Beast, just so he can relish in vanquishing it once more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad