The idea that we should sit Nash because Hank is sitting is moronic. We have Talbot performing extremely well behind Hank. Who is replacing Nash? Pyatt?
How can people say Nash is bad? Really? The guy has had some injury problems and is struggling, sure he could maybe be sat and that is reasonable... But to say he's bad? Come on now. That's ignorant.
Is Del Zotto in the lineup tonight? Wondering with all of these trade rumors.
Since you're a Devils fan I'll forgive you for not understanding how the logic works around here.
How can people say Nash is bad? Really? The guy has had some injury problems and is struggling, sure he could maybe be sat and that is reasonable... But to say he's bad? Come on now. That's ignorant.
Since you're a Devils fan I'll forgive you for not understanding how the logic works around here.
How can people say Nash is bad? Really? The guy has had some injury problems and is struggling, sure he could maybe be sat and that is reasonable... But to say he's bad? Come on now. That's ignorant.
The idea to keep under performing players in the line up is "moronic" as you agree with it. Let me spell it out for you, it's not because Hank is bad I want Nash to sit, it's because HE'S BAD!!! Good God
Thank you DevsFan for at least trying to talk reason with some people here. Its hilarious if god forbid a player struggles a couple games.
A couple of games ? He has been pretty mediocre since joining the rangers and now plays not to get hurt.
He's supposed to be a power forward, go to the dirty areas and score goals. He plays a perimeter game and rarely engages.
A one armed Gaborik was more effective
Good to know that 21 goals in 44 games is mediocre. Brilliant observation.
Sorry he is pretty much a non factor IMHO. Yes he has points so did Richards last year.
He has 3 hits this year. The guy is not elite. And he gets paid to be dominate. Wake me up when he decides to play like he is supposedly capable
Yeah, the guy said he's been mediocre since coming here, which is not true. He's had a bad 25 games. Let's crucify him!!!!!21 goals in 44 games is last year i thought?
Ok.
You said "if AV wants to be consistent, he should sit Nash, too"
I countered "there is no one capable of replacing what Nash brings, while Talbot has been better than Hank"
They are not comparable situations.
Logic! It's not just for the coherent anymore.
So....tell me.....what is it exactly that Nash is "bringing"? Exactly
He's had a rough three weeks or so. BFD. He's 10x more skilled than any of our forwards outside of maybe Zucc. This is getting ridiculous.So....tell me.....what is it exactly that Nash is "bringing"? Exactly