Prospect Info: 33rd overall Roby Jarventie LW FIN

Icelevel

During these difficult times...
Sep 9, 2009
25,829
5,846
Gives me some havlat vibes.
Complimentary explosive offensive exciting player.
 

MatchesMalone

Formerly Innocent Bystander
Aug 29, 2010
1,612
1,071
But physical traits are definitely passed down. That is 100% a fact. Barring genetic mutation you get all of your physical traits from the DNA of your parents. The offspring of Zdeno Chara is absolutely more likely to be a powerful, fast twitch type of person than the children of Danny DeVito.

If one of your parents is a 6'2 200 pound person with great proportions and an aptitude for speed, power, agility and hand-eye coordination (eg. a pro athlete) the deck is statistically stacked in your favour to have those traits when compared with a person whose parents are not athletically gifted. It isn't close to a sure thing that a legacy player will have a genetic advantage and you can't definitively pinpoint genetics as the sole reason that an individual excels. However, as a demographic group people with pro athletes as parents are more likely to be good at sports than the population at large. A significant portion of that is genetics.

Once a person has those genetics all the things you mentioned definitely improve their chances even against other genetically superior individuals.

It's quite likely that these young players are born with an advantage and then almost all of them benefit from learned behaviours from their parents, sound advice, additional resources, etc..

:amazed:
 

MatchesMalone

Formerly Innocent Bystander
Aug 29, 2010
1,612
1,071
If what BondraTime is saying is that you're at a genetic advantage having a former NHLer as a dad, I don't know how you could possibly argue against that. There are too many connections to call it a coincidence. It certainly doesn't make it a surefire thing, but it's a definite advantage.

Nobody is arguing against that. The debate is whether genetics is the primary reason that the sons of NHL players have an advantage.

And also whether there are genetic traits specific to hockey, not athleticism in general.
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,133
65,449
Ottawa, ON
Nurture vs. Nature arguments are pretty hard to prove either way.

They get physical gifts from their parents but they are also raised in a positive hockey environment with all of the requisite contacts associated and access to the latest in training and skill development.
 

Masked

(Super/star)
Apr 16, 2017
6,835
5,095
They got the donuts? Excellent....
Nurture vs. Nature arguments are pretty hard to prove either way.

They get physical gifts from their parents but they are also raised in a positive hockey environment with all of the requisite contacts associated and access to the latest in training and skill development.

Not hockey but baseball however the story of Richard Dotson would suggest Nature more than Nurture.
 

SensFan1010

Registered User
Dec 18, 2019
592
430
Id say it would have more to do with the connections then the actually athleticism. For instance Domis dad was never a skilled hockey player but max is very skilled. Its not because he inherited those genes from his father its because he grew up learning the game from guys like mat Sudin. Imagine the difference that makes.
Also a lot of pros will have links to agents and have the ability to talk to scouts watching his son which will give the kid the edge up on all the others.
 

Senscore

Let's keep it cold
Nov 19, 2012
21,518
17,180
In the case of Yao Ming, it was a deliberate attempt by the Chinese government to produce a star athlete. Kind of insane but I suppose it worked.

Was Yao Ming Bred?
 

TheDebater

Peace be upon you
Mar 10, 2016
6,251
6,003
Ottawa
Looking like Dorion is going to be 2 for 2 with this pick. Last year with Pinto over Kaliyev, and now Jarventie over Peterka.

Of course, it is still very early but damn if it does not make me happy.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad