Toggle sidebar

GDT: #31 - 12/08/13 | Washington Capitals @ New York Rangers | 7:00 PM - MSG

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
As great as the employees at Madison Square Garden may be, the constant changeovers are hurting the surface we have to try to win on... we have to find a way to turn this ice surface into an advantage.
 
FromTheSide said:
It's unrealistic of me to expect common sense on common plays that happen all the time? Lol alrighty. You clearly don't get the point of everyone should know how to do these little things like being aware of your surroundings and having the numbers game on a rush.
Click to expand...

Yes. It's unrealistic that you should expect a 4th line to be filled with players that play well in all three zones. You clearly don't understand the cap implications of fielding such a team. You could always overpay your 4th line (and stack it with third liners), but have fun without having any viable 1st line players.

This is a pretty simple concept. It's cost-prohibitive to field a 4th line filled with guys who can play well in all three zones. You are going to sacrifice something if you want guys that are (for example -- like Boyle) good in the defensive zone.

You could always have a 4th line filled with Pyatts (players that are neither terrible nor good in ANY zone) if you'd prefer.
 
Jonathan. said:
Yes. It's unrealistic that you should expect a 4th line to be filled with players that play well in all three zones. You clearly don't understand the cap implications of fielding such a team. You could always overpay your 4th line (and stack it with third liners), but have fun without having any viable 1st line players.

This is a pretty simple concept. It's cost-prohibitive to field a 4th line filled with guys who can play well in all three zones. You are going to sacrifice something if you want guys that are (for example -- like Boyle) good in the defensive zone.

You could always have a 4th line filled with Pyatts (players that are neither terrible nor good in ANY zone) if you'd prefer.
Click to expand...

Is he asking for a whole 4th line to be that way or is he asking that Boyle know what to do on an odd man rush? Not being a wise ass I read the latter but don't care to reread so I'm just askinglolgoal against while hank practices his snow angel technique
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom