True Blue
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 30,092
- 8,362
If you believe that making the playoffs is not important, you have not been paying attention. To that extent, if the PP looks good with vets and is getting results, then Quinn is not really going to be making changes.My issue with DQ, is that he was brought in to develop players, make them adapt and improve at the NHL level. Winning was not his top priority, since rebuilding teams are not supposed to compete for a playoff spot in the first couple of years of a rebuild. I'm ok with that, as long as I see the young players getting minutes and improving as the season and years go along.
What I'm seeing is, over usage of veteran players, more ice time for less impactful players and stagnation from our young studs...
I understand that playing in the NHL is a difficult step up for all these first rounders, especially since they never played in the AHL, or North American game (except Chytil), and knowing and learning the defensive responsibilities takes time to learn. You want to give more ice time to young players when you see they are ready to handle them, it's called development.
However, when you have a first overall and a second overall pick in your lineup and they don't get any meaningful PP time, especially after they've shown to be playing well, it doesn't make sense to me. I'll add Chytil in there as well, who gets NO PP time. BTW, has Chytil really improved over 3 years (DQ had him 3 years ago...)? These are offensive players/kids, so I understand that DQ wants to limit their ES ice time, but they need to get PP time, even just to gain some confidence...
When I see Strome getting PP time over Kakko last night, I get infuriated...at least Buch should be there instead of Strome, crazy!
It's evident winning is DQ's TOP priority, not developing and for me, if that's the case, DQ is not the right man for that job!
With that said, whether or not they make the playoffs or not is not will not be the biggest factor in management's view of Quinn. If the kids continue to develop and not take steps back, will be. To that extent, I think that 3 games is hardly the accurate time to make that determination. Again, unless the Rangers are competing for the lottery and the kids are not developing, he will be back for year 4