Rumor is the Rangers offered Chytil, Lindgren, and a future asset of significance--probably a 1st.
The first one was way more fun to watch than the second one imo. Wingers were super aggressive all the time forcing turnovers all over the ice. The second cup was a lot of 1-2-2 and most games weren’t nearly as fun to watch. Some of the Ottawa games were brutal to watch. Not having Letang for that run probably played into that too.
Yeah, it was a hell of an accomplishment, but it's not a style of hockey I like watching, and I'm not one of those people who can watch boring-but-winning hockey. I think it's an abomination.
What about boring-but-also-losing?
I mean, I guess. I'd hate to see us become the trap-era Devils just to say we "won" by having an absolutely awful product that just exploits some blindsides in the rules.
And? Our D is already in the bottom 5-10 of the league. It’s putrid. Why would we keep Karlsson if someone wants him? We suck with him, we can suck without him.
Think that'd be more detrimental to our offense as his statement alludes. Which atm is 13th OA though propped up by the power play.
Why should we care about the team getting worse in the short term. Isn’t that the idea? If someone was willing to give us a package like that for EK and we turned it down, we’d deserve to be the next Buffalo Sabres.
To be honest, I've stopped watching until Sullivan is gone, but they aren't scoring a 'ton'. They are 16th in GF/G.
Offense. GF.
I'd trade him instantly if no positive assests have to be attached in order to move him. Even if it costs heavy retention. 2 spots open up in the off-season.
