- Jun 13, 2010
- 44,022
- 23,317
Yeah that's a good point. I really wish we didn't have to retain on the corpse of Petry. Having an extra retention slot would be nice (or two). It would mean that you likely have to take cap back in a Pettersson or Bunting deal though. Not the end of the world but then you get into the territory of "is the juice worth the squeeze?" between this year or next. I'd feel better about trading him out if I knew we had an internal replacement for him that is not named Nieto, Hayes, Acciari, Puljujarvi, etc.Id still try to move Bunting even though I like him. He isn't that expensive of a depth forward at 4.5. Especially with the cap going up a lot this summer. I would actually try to move Petts at full value and retain on bunting.
Bunting has as many points in the past 3 seasons as someone like Lindholm. If you retained 50% you might be able to get a first for him. He would be a great deal for a contender at 2.25 for 2 years. I don't think there is anyway you get first even with retention for petts.
Why does Bunting need to rebound? He is on pace for almost 50pts and 25goals. That his norm and also reasonable for his contract
Speaking of Boston, I think they are going to get a good price on Frederic at the TDL so Bunting could be an attractive option, especially if Marchand gets trades or retires. I think Bunting also that's that Boston-mentality level of hockey too. If you really want to get wild, you could offer a Bunting for Lindholm+ deal. I don't think it's a stretch to say it hasn't worked out for him so it could be a chance to erase it. Meanwhile, Lindholm comes in at 2C with Malkin on his wing. Then he's our 1/2C through the rebuild.
No, I was replying to Emp who said Bunting's value could tank if he has to playing with Hayes at 2C (if Malkin is out for the year). I was saying, that if you keep him and his play does drop, he still likely rebound next year back to his norm.Why does Bunting need to rebound? He is on pace for almost 50pts and 25goals. That his norm and also reasonable for his contract
As is, he doesn't need to rebound. I would even suggest that, given his history and contract, his value might be at an all time high right now. Or slightly more if he finishes the year strong and a team wants an off-season deal.