Namestnikov is capable of little more than getting it deep and energy. He's a 4th liner through and through.
I agree. Too many people defend this scrub.Namestnikov is a mediocre player with really lackluster production who somehow has a lot of defenders on these boards.
Clueless about hockey? What if someone uses +/-, advanced metrics, and the eye test combined? Of course you can’t just use +/- by itself. It never tells the whole story. But what stat does?
Smacked around? You're the worst internet debater I've ever witnessed. Your comeback to actual, legitimate arguments is 'well, I don't like that so it sux.'
Quinn has to get Mika off that line, it’s killing his production.Namestnikov is capable of little more than getting it deep and energy. He's a 4th liner through and through.
Hell no
Shades of Dan GirardiShattenkirk with these weak lobs from the boards to the net. ****ing sick of that.
Put everything on net with authority you *****.