Rumor: 23-24 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Part Trois: The Road to the Deadline

Status
Not open for further replies.

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
Lehkonen is literally our only top 6 wing without question marks around him and the cheapest of the bunch. He's also the exact type of player you win cups with.

When you start moving your good contracts to keep the bad ones you're doomed.
I can follow that logic… but how do you make room without drastically hurting the team? Mikko is probably the response, but how often does a team trade the best player in the deal and end up better that season?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
33,516
24,355
Jenner is quickly becoming one of the overrated players on this board. He’s a good player who scores about 40 points a season, but reading about him here, one would think he’s like a 100 point player
 

Colorado Avalanche

No Babe pictures
Sponsor
Apr 24, 2004
29,521
9,785
Lieto
Moving Rants would either extend our window and make us a more balanced team or completely f*** us, and there's no way to know ahead of time. I can see both side of the argument. I love the dude, but he's going to be the biggest issue soon.
I agree. It would be a huge gamble.

There’s no way Rants get more than MacK with the Avs.

The Duchene cap has been replaced with the MacK cap
and we shouldnt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: niwotsblessing

Avs44

Registered User
May 16, 2011
21,889
10,678
I can follow that logic… but how do you make room without drastically hurting the team? Mikko is probably the response, but how often does a team trade the best player in the deal and end up better that season?
It obviously depends a lot on how this season ends...and we can't really predict the future with the massive uncertainties around Landy and Nuke...but assuming both Nuke and Landy are on next year's roster, it seems to me that accepting a "down" year for 2024-2025 and trading Rantanen this offseason for a nice package of younger players to an Eastern Conference team looking to make a huge splash makes the most sense. And this should be accompanied by going absolutely all in this season to hopefully get another cup with Rantanen on the team.

Now, I don't think that'll happen -- I think the Avs will make the safe move (like most teams) and pay up for Rantanen while clearing space elsewhere -- but even if they move Lehkonen to clear that space...I don't think it's all that feasible to win a cup after 2025 if they're paying Rantanen north of 12 million, Landeskog 7 million (assuming he's no longer prime Landy but a middle six version of his old self), and Nuke 6.125.

Obviously moving Rantanen would have tons of risks, ones I don't think this management group will make, but it seems to be the best way to extend the window. Otherwise, if Rantanen gets ~12.5 million (which is probably conservative), we're looking at 55 million locked into our top center, three top wingers, and two top defensmen? That's too top heavy. As I see it, either the window slams shut after 2025 or you take the risk of closing the window in 2024-2025 and hope that you can build back into it the year after.
 

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,779
8,075
Let's not forget that a Mikko deal will certainly come with an NMC attached to it for probably the first 4 years so impossible to move him unless he agrees to it. It really needs to be this summer but as I said they can't screw that up. I'm OK with the team having a down year next season if he is traded and it extends the window for a few more years after that. They need to give it their best shot this season though if they go that route.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
67,095
53,592
Even if it is only one down year, you’d be starting that season with MacK, Nuke, Landy, Toews, Lehky, and Wood all on the wrong side of 30. Colton at 29. Then hoping at very minimum Ritchie and the top prospect you got in the Rants trade would be immediately ready as impact guys that season. That is an awfully big ask and threading a needle. I just really don’t see that as a window extending move… its more of a closing and re-tooling move that you hope the core forwards are still capable at 33-35 when you come out of it (the LA model).

It isn’t impossible certainly… it just seems like a very narrow path to success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TruePowerSlave

Bender

Registered User
Sep 25, 2002
17,809
9,517
Jenner is quickly becoming one of the overrated players on this board. He’s a good player who scores about 40 points a season, but reading about him here, one would think he’s like a 100 point player
But...but... he can MENTOR young players for the next 4 years before he retires !!! Surely THAT - and that alone - will transform the blue jackets from perrenial bottow-dwellers to multiple-time Stanley Cup Champions!

My only question is this : is the mentorship just going to start like right now or has it been happening this whole time?
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,258
56,597
There’s no way Rants get more than MacK with the Avs.

The Duchene cap has been replaced with the MacK cap
Makar's agent:

6gjMyIl.gif
 

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
33,516
24,355
But...but... he can MENTOR young players for the next 4 years before he retires !!! Surely THAT - and that alone - will transform the blue jackets from perrenial bottow-dwellers to multiple-time Stanley Cup Champions!

My only question is this : is the mentorship just going to start like right now or has it been happening this whole time?
Jackets don’t need mentorship, they just need to keep signing expensive UFAs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,678
32,070
I don´t see how a Rantanen trade extends the window, it more likely ends it. The team needs to win right now before the eventual plunge into darkness.

I feel the same. They'd have to pull off a Huberdeau for Tkchauk kind of lateral move that pays off. Not a package deal, which would make them worse.

And Florida kind of lucked their way into that. Both with Tkchauk being available and in control to an extent where he went and signed an extension.

Can't really plan on that situation happening for the Avs, so you can't really plan on trading Mikko and expecting your team to be at the same level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,678
32,070
Exactly this, you don't worry about your legacy; it's determined by how many Cups you win with a contending team.

Think of Pierre Lacroix. All-in every single season when you're blessed with multiple elite players. Trade for Theo Fleury, it didn't work out, but did he "learn" from that and change his ways? Hell no. All-in again for Bourque, Blake... you keep going with the eye on the ultimate prize.

You can't compare strategies in the pre cap NHL to the cap NHL. PL's success was entirely different under the cap.

Sakic and CMac win one more Cup with their strategy of giving themselves multiple shots at a Cup with a long window, instead of the all in every year approach that only gives you 2 or 3, and they match what PL achieved anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: obZen

BaconNater

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
5,182
3,787
CO
Acceptable outcomes: Kadri, Middlestadt
HfAvs unacceptable outcomes: anyone else in this years deadline rumors

Good list?

But for real the Kefoort "rumor" is perfect for the crappy deadline thoughts around here haha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad