Rumor: 23-24 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Part Trois: The Road to the Deadline

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bender

Registered User
Sep 25, 2002
17,824
9,530
So it's been mentioned in recent days that depth (or 'dep') as Patrick Roy would say - and having lots of it could compensate for a lack of star power in the playoffs.

I don't necessarily subscribe to that theory - I personally believe that you do need depth but having the right kind of players that are -> appropriately slotted <- for a long playoff run is probably more important than having a whole bunch of extra options but players that don't necessarily play the way you need to in the playoffs to win.

The Avs have been guilty of having too many of the same type of players over the years and it's cost them. We all know who these guys are : Nieto, Jost, Dries, Newhook, Andrighetto, G.Bourque, etc..

Now we've got Olofsson and Kiviranta - who are again, in that mold. Not particularly efficient in any area. Not great on faceoffs, not physical and not hard to play against. If these guys become fill-in players because we added guys who are any one of those characteristics then I'm fine with it. Otherwise, it's lack of foresight.

So don't look now but Ross the Boss is currently on track for a 45 point season. That's not exactly a 50 point #2C but it's close especially when you consider that he's been playing 3rd line minutes for the majority of the season. So then the question becomes, could the Avs view him as that guy on the second line since there doesn't appear to be a lot of other options and they could grab 2 or 3 third/fourth line players to add to the group instead?

I'm just throwing it out there. This is NOT my favourite option because I believe that it makes for an unbalanced lineup and a guy who is probably improperly slotted. Having Wood-Colton-LOC as a 3rd line is fantastic and that's a line that could wreak havoc in the playoffs as long as Line #1 and Line #2 are doing their job as well.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,148
26,353
So it's been mentioned in recent days that depth (or 'dep') as Patrick Roy would say - and having lots of it could compensate for a lack of star power in the playoffs.

I don't necessarily subscribe to that theory - I personally believe that you do need depth but having the right kind of players that are -> appropriately slotted <- for a long playoff run is probably more important than having a whole bunch of extra options but players that don't necessarily play the way you need to in the playoffs to win.

The Avs have been guilty of having too many of the same type of players over the years and it's cost them. We all know who these guys are : Nieto, Jost, Dries, Newhook, Andrighetto, G.Bourque, etc..

Now we've got Olofsson and Kiviranta - who are again, in that mold. Not particularly efficient in any area. Not great on faceoffs, not physical and not hard to play against. If these guys become fill-in players because we added guys who are any one of those characteristics then I'm fine with it. Otherwise, it's lack of foresight.

So don't look now but Ross the Boss is currently on track for a 45 point season. That's not exactly a 50 point #2C but it's close especially when you consider that he's been playing 3rd line minutes for the majority of the season. So then the question becomes, could the Avs view him as that guy on the second line since there doesn't appear to be a lot of other options and they could grab 2 or 3 third/fourth line players to add to the group instead?

I'm just throwing it out there. This is NOT my favourite option because I believe that it makes for an unbalanced lineup and a guy who is probably improperly slotted. Having Wood-Colton-LOC as a 3rd line is fantastic and that's a line that could wreak havoc in the playoffs as long as Line #1 and Line #2 are doing their job as well.
If we go into the post season with Colton as the 2C we aren’t winning a round.
 

Bender

Registered User
Sep 25, 2002
17,824
9,530
If we go into the post season with Colton as the 2C we aren’t winning a round.
Again, that wouldn't be my favorite option but I'm wondering how C-Makic see it.

They really need to get a Nelson or Mittelstadt level of player because then everyone below slots down to where they should be. Even the nuclear option (Hertl) is better than wasting another year not having made the right moves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: niwotsblessing

EdAVSfan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2009
7,677
4,716
I think CMac and co are definitely waiting for news on Nuke and Landeskog. Their availability or lack thereof makes a difference on the moves they make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: niwotsblessing

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,148
26,353
Again, that wouldn't be my favorite option but I'm wondering how C-Makic see it.

They really need to get a Nelson or Mittelstadt level of player because then everyone below slots down to where they should be. Even the nuclear option (Hertl) is better than wasting another year not having made the right moves.
I mean if they see that it’s fine to roll Colton as the 2C in the playoffs thats a real problem.
 

chet1926

Registered User
Jan 9, 2008
13,025
6,550
Denver
I think CMac and co are definitely waiting for news on Nuke and Landeskog. Their availability or lack thereof makes a difference on the moves they make.
It shouldn't make a difference, neither is capable of playing 2C.

Not too mention the fact that if you are reactionary and not proactive as a GM you are most likely going to fail. Got to attack problems not react to them.

Unfortunately CMac has proven to be very reactionary so we get the bottom of barrel choices and have a roster that is poorly constructed.
 

Avs_19

Registered User
Jun 28, 2007
85,765
34,554
Colton as 2C would be the exact same mistake as last year when they went with Compher based on his regular season, even though we all knew that wasn't going to cut it in the playoffs.

Different mistakes than the hope and prayers with guys like Jost and Newhook though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
33,520
24,357
Colton as 2C would be the exact same mistake as last year when they went with Compher based on his regular season, even though we all knew that wasn't going to cut it in the playoffs.

Different mistakes than the hope and prayers with guys like Jost and Newhook though!
I think that depends if they have a better 3C than Eller or Newhook. Going with Colton as 2C won’t be ideal, but if they have better 3rd and 4th line centers, it could work. Just for an example, if you have center depth of MacK, Colton, Gourde, Dowd, that’ll work, but not if you have Eller and Olofsson behind Colton
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alienblood

Freaky Styley

Registered User
Aug 14, 2007
5,355
3,480
redlinerapport.blogspot.ca
I think that depends if they have a better 3C than Eller or Newhook. Going with Colton as 2C won’t be ideal, but if they have better 3rd and 4th line centers, it could work. Just for an example, if you have center depth of MacK, Colton, Gourde, Dowd, that’ll work, but not if you have Eller and Olofsson behind Colton
Well Gourde is better than Colton, so he'd be 2C
 

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,779
8,075
My take is the Avs most likely have an idea when Nuke is coming back. They most likely have a pretty good idea as well if Landy is coming back for the playoffs having him now here in Denver. He is looking pretty good on the ice in the past few days. With those guys coming back my question is:

How can anybody think this team is poorly constructed:
Drouin - Mack- Mikko
Landy - 2C - Nuke
Wood - Rosco - Lehky
Parise/Cogs - Parise/Cogs - LOC
Kovalenko - Wagner - Olofsson - Kiviranta

Toews - Makar
Girard - Mason
Johnson - Byram
Malinski - Jones

All that this team needs is one move. We all know what that move is: 2C. IMO they are one move away from being a stronger team on paper than the '22 team that won a SC. I say on paper because it depends on which Landy is coming back.
 

the_fan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2006
33,520
24,357
Somehow trade RyJo, get Gourde with retention and get Dowd

Nuke-MacK-Mikko
Lehky-Gourde-Drouin
Landy-Colton-Wood
LOC-Dowd-Cogs/Kovalenko
 

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,716
7,427
My take is the Avs most likely have an idea when Nuke is coming back. They most likely have a pretty good idea as well if Landy is coming back for the playoffs having him now here in Denver. He is looking pretty good on the ice in the past few days. With those guys coming back my question is:

How can anybody think this team is poorly constructed:
Drouin - Mack- Mikko
Landy - 2C - Nuke
Wood - Rosco - Lehky
Parise/Cogs - Parise/Cogs - LOC
Kovalenko - Wagner - Olofsson - Kiviranta

Toews - Makar
Girard - Mason
Johnson - Byram
Malinski - Jones

All that this team needs is one move. We all know what that move is: 2C. IMO they are one move away from being a stronger team on paper than the '22 team that won a SC. I say on paper because it depends on which Landy is coming back.

Having a legitimate 2C the entire year vs 2 months shouldnt be dismissed. Having the 2C for all or most of the season allows Bednar to lighten the TOI load on several other players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stanley Thermos

chet1926

Registered User
Jan 9, 2008
13,025
6,550
Denver
If Colton ends up the plan at 2C, it will be time to get some new voices in the front office.
I'd say it's already time for some new voices there. It's clearly gotten stale, and their ideas are garbage that isn't working.

I really don't care that CMac hasn't even had a 2nd trade deadline. He's shown literal nothing and shows no signs of addressing the issues.

Throwing bandaid players, 40 year basically retired players at massive holes isn't it. Never has been, never will be.

Parise for example would have been a nice signing, had we not had massive 2nd line problems. But when you have the 2nd line problem, singing Parise is a bad move/completely worthless move as it takes away money and didn't solve any issues.
 

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,779
8,075
Having a legitimate 2C the entire year vs 2 months shouldnt be dismissed. Having the 2C for all or most of the season allows Bednar to lighten the TOI load on several other players.
Yeah you are right. They took a gamble with RyJo and it failed. All they have to do is fix it.
 

TruePowerSlave

Registered User
Jun 27, 2015
7,566
9,170
Yeah you are right. They took a gamble with RyJo and it failed. All they have to do is fix it.
I wouldn´t even call it a gamble.

RyJo was never going to work, especially on a Bednar team. Either they didn´t scout the player, just completely forgot what brand of hockey the coach plays or were cheap as usual and said f*** it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad