Correct? We have an excess of dmen so moving one of them for a good C would make sense in balancing the team.Because you're not adding a 60 point center asset free on a reasonable deal in UFA. You're giving up prime assets for one, and then have to re-sign him after just a few games and risk an overpayment.
Correct? We have an excess of dmen so moving one of them for a good C would make sense in balancing the team.
Henrique isn’t a full time center, is old and not a long term solution… Mitts is prime aged and a long term solution. Of course there’s a difference in asking price.This is why Mitts being a 60 point center is relevant. A 60 point center is fine. Giving up prime assets for one is not.
Especially when Henrique won't cost prime assets, and is scoring at a higher goal pace, and just a slightly lower point pace at 56. He's also much better on faceoffs.
Henrique isn’t a center, is old and not a long term solution… Mitts is prime aged and a long term solution. Of course there’s a difference in asking price.
The Ducks move Henrique around as their veteran swiss army knife, to accommodate their top young talents. Even when not officially listed at center in the lineup on a given night, he's often taking a lot of the center duties defensively and most the of the draws. This year there's been a revolving door of injuries between Zegras, McTavish, Carlsson, so that's led to Rico playing more full time down the middle. But definitely was doing a bit of a winger/center hybrid thing while Zegras was first getting his feet wet at the center position, and never seems to have any trouble seamlessly moving between center and wing.
Even then, he’s 34. Again not a long term solution whereas you’d be getting Mitts through the end of his prime and our contention window.This is said a lot, but he plays a lot of center, and clearly plays it well enough to come within a few points of Mitts. Doesn't matter if he's not a full time center. If he can play center, that's all that matters.
Mitts being a long term solution is what risks a long term overpayment. Avs might already have their long term solution in Ritchie anyway.
We could sign Mitts for 7M max I would think. You keep him until Ritchie is ready then you trade him to recoup some assets.
I'm not afraid of that.Not recouping much if stays a 60 point center at $7M or regresses though.
Dad?It’s not a question of ifberg, but Wennberg
That’s what the wife keeps telling meI’m hearing I’ll be disappointed come Friday. Sad if true.
I’m ready for everyone to be upset if we trade for Wennberg.
I’m also ready for everyone to be upset if we don’t trade for Wennberg