The issue here is that most of the time people don't pay attention at what he says or the way he says it. Friedman is very careful with his words especially with regard to the Avs. He never says "I heard" or something like that. He says "I believe", "i think", " I wouldn't be surprised", etc. then people start with the rumors.
Indeed, and this is true for most insiders. You really have to pay attention to the wording they use. I feel like Friedman always makes it clear when he speculates, whereas Seravalli and Dreger make their opinions sound much more like actual facts. This is a reason I don't really like Dreger, though I can't question his work as an insider. I really like LeBrun and CJ, they pretty much just stick to the facts, or don't really mention specific names.
He's no different than LeBrun, or Dreiger, or Johnston, or Pagnotta, or Seravalli, etc. They all do the same things.
I disagree, some speculate more than others and some people know more about specific teams than others. LeBrun has shown for years that he has some taps in the Avs organization, and even he doesn't get a whole lot from them. But if he says that the Avs are onto something, I do trust him while I wouldn't trust Friedman per se.
All that said, Friedman is still the #1 insider who gets most of the stuff first.