Rumor: 23-24 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Part Trois: The Road to the Deadline

Status
Not open for further replies.

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,778
8,075
Technically, he still hasn't. Being a finalist doesn't mean shit.

One positive - if he's trying that aggressively to dump RyJo and pick up ANOTHER defenseman, I can't help but hope he might actually have a center lined up for one of our LHD. i.e. Mittelstadt for Byram

One negative - he didn't get Tanev, so everything might have fallen apart. Kadri/EJ negotiations all over again.
Technically he did. He is paid to make and receive calls.
 

forsbergavs32

Global Moderator
Jan 21, 2011
29,077
28,339
Fresno,CA
I haven’t paid much attention to the Blues this year. Capfriendly has Buchnevich listed as a center and winger, how much center does he play?
 

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,678
32,070
Which probably means hes banking on Colton to be the Avs 2C until Ritchie arrives. Great. f***in. Plan.

Might be a sliding scale of sorts.

If Calgary takes a 1st + RJ, then he sends multiple prospects and a 2nd to Anaheim for Henrique. If he doesn't, maybe he offers a 1st and one prospect for Henrique.

Verbeek was GM when they gave up a 2nd + Helleson (2nd rounder) for Manson.

Henrique's not perfect, but he should be an upgrade on Colton in a 2C role. 55 point pace vs a 42 point pace.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,240
56,574
He was sending RyJo other way as well, so who is left to send for a new #2 center? Byram? Girard? I wouldn't sell Ritchie
If he's sending G or Byram for Mittelstadt or something similar there's no reason to wait at the deadline to do that.

He's probably aiming for Henrique or Wennberg, which aren't worth a 1st pick. Problem is we're short of 2nd and 3rd picks. Wonder how he'll navigate that.

It's also possible that he thinks that Mack, Rants, Nuke, Landy, Lehky and Drouin is a fine top 6 and there's no need to add a 2C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche

Colorado Avalanche

No Babe pictures
Sponsor
Apr 24, 2004
29,519
9,783
Lieto
Might be a sliding scale of sorts.

If Calgary takes a 1st + RJ, then he sends multiple prospects and a 2nd to Anaheim for Henrique. If he doesn't, maybe he offers a 1st and one prospect for Henrique.

Verbeek was GM when they gave up a 2nd + Helleson (2nd rounder) for Manson.

Henrique's not perfect, but he should be an upgrade on Colton in a 2C role. 55 point pace vs a 42 point pace.

I mean Henrique plays 2-3 minutes more per game and probably way more on powerplay. Easy to rack up points with big playing time.(Compared to Colton).

They would be probably close in terms of output if teams changed and roles.
 

Drury_Sakic

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
4,951
817
www.avalanchedb.com
Have wondered for awhile if there was a world where the Avs trade Byram for that second line center and then add to the blue line with more of a futures based deal. Guess that shows that might have been part of the plan.

Moving RyJo is going to be a big part of that type of deal though. And that may prove to be difficult.
 

RoyIsALegend

Gross Misconduct
Sponsor
Oct 24, 2008
24,201
36,394
Have wondered for awhile if there was a world where the Avs trade Byram for that second line center and then add to the blue line with more of a futures based deal. Guess that shows that might have been part of the plan.

Moving RyJo is going to be a big part of that type of deal though. And that may prove to be difficult.

I'm thinking we go for Phaneuf and Kessel.
 

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,778
8,075
If he's sending G or Byram for Mittelstadt or something similar there's no reason to wait at the deadline to do that.

He's probably aiming for Henrique or Wennberg, which aren't worth a 1st pick. Problem is we're short of 2nd and 3rd picks. Wonder how he'll navigate that.

It's also possible that he thinks that Mack, Rants, Nuke, Landy, Lehky and Drouin is a fine top 6 and there's no need to add a 2C.
No there isn't but there would be a need to clear Ryjo's cap though for Cozens.
 

The Moops

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2017
4,830
7,808
Earth
That's close to how I view it, and I agree their draft record makes it harder, but that "competitive as long as possible" time frame, includes some very competitive teams with the best players in the world.

That makes a big difference between the Avs and just a good team being as competitive as long as possible.

Think about it this way. If the Avs went all in every year, there's a good chance they wouldn't have won last year anyway with all their missing players, and they wouldn't have Ritchie, because they probably traded that 1st round pick in a year they shouldn't have.

Which would mean they wouldn't have a potential cheap 2C with Ritchie in future years, that will allow them to keep good players like Val and Lehky, and have more shots at a Cup than they would have by going all in when they shouldn't have.

Also, they may not have Lehky, because they went all in a previous year for a worse player, and couldn't afford him. Manson too, who I think is very valuable in the playoffs, though some disagree.

That's the benefit of calculated aggression. You wait for the right players that fit your team well, and you believe you can keep so they can help you long term, and then you aggressively pursue them like we know the Avs did with Lehky all year. And you don't give up key players/prospects, you give up prospects like Barron or Helleson who play a position you have lots of depth in.

Just my opinion, but I think this is much closer to the optimal strategy for team building under the cap, than just rolling the dice by going all in every year.
I agree mostly. Just feel like you have to rip open the window and break it out of the wall if possible so you can win when you're at your peak. But I do think targeting guys like Lehky and Manson who they could sign were very shrewd moves. Time will tell though if keeping Manson over Naz was the right move
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foppa2118

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,678
32,070
No there isn't but there would be a need to clear Ryjo's cap though for Cozens.

Cozens seems unlikely to me for a few reasons.

He's in the first year of his 7 year deal, so that makes it seem unlikely for Buffalo. Usually teams plan on building around players they sign long term, and rarely trade them the first year.

And for Colorado, he's actually on a worse pace this year than Henrique who should be much cheaper, and Cozens is locked into $7.1M for 7 years.

23 goal 55 point pace for Henrique vs 18 goal 53 point pace for Cozens.

Doesn't seem like the kind of move the Avs would gamble on, by giving up key pieces, but who knows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad