He was sending RyJo other way as well, so who is left to send for a new #2 center? Byram? Girard? I wouldn't sell RitchieIf CNap really offered a first for Tanev that obviously means that he doesn't plan to use it for a center.
He was sending RyJo other way as well, so who is left to send for a new #2 center? Byram? Girard? I wouldn't sell RitchieIf CNap really offered a first for Tanev that obviously means that he doesn't plan to use it for a center.
Which probably means hes banking on Colton to be the Avs 2C until Ritchie arrives. Great. f***in. Plan.If CNap really offered our first for Tanev that obviously means that he doesn't plan to use it for a center.
I'd give Cmac's left but for Brock Nelson or Boone Jenner.
Which probably means hes banking on Colton to be the Avs 2C until Ritchie arrives. Great. f***in. Plan.
Technically he did. He is paid to make and receive calls.Technically, he still hasn't. Being a finalist doesn't mean shit.
One positive - if he's trying that aggressively to dump RyJo and pick up ANOTHER defenseman, I can't help but hope he might actually have a center lined up for one of our LHD. i.e. Mittelstadt for Byram
One negative - he didn't get Tanev, so everything might have fallen apart. Kadri/EJ negotiations all over again.
Everything you listed? And other draft picks we have (including firsts in other years)? Ritchie as well is an option, no?He was sending RyJo other way as well, so who is left to send for a new #2 center? Byram? Girard? I wouldn't sell Ritchie
Which probably means hes banking on Colton to be the Avs 2C until Ritchie arrives. Great. f***in. Plan.
Exactly so my belief is Byram would be the piece going the other way. It has become very quiet with BUF so I think Cozens or Mitts is the 2C targeted/already lined up.If CNap really offered our first for Tanev that obviously means that he doesn't plan to use it for a center.
If he's sending G or Byram for Mittelstadt or something similar there's no reason to wait at the deadline to do that.He was sending RyJo other way as well, so who is left to send for a new #2 center? Byram? Girard? I wouldn't sell Ritchie
Might be a sliding scale of sorts.
If Calgary takes a 1st + RJ, then he sends multiple prospects and a 2nd to Anaheim for Henrique. If he doesn't, maybe he offers a 1st and one prospect for Henrique.
Verbeek was GM when they gave up a 2nd + Helleson (2nd rounder) for Manson.
Henrique's not perfect, but he should be an upgrade on Colton in a 2C role. 55 point pace vs a 42 point pace.
Have wondered for awhile if there was a world where the Avs trade Byram for that second line center and then add to the blue line with more of a futures based deal. Guess that shows that might have been part of the plan.
Moving RyJo is going to be a big part of that type of deal though. And that may prove to be difficult.
No there isn't but there would be a need to clear Ryjo's cap though for Cozens.If he's sending G or Byram for Mittelstadt or something similar there's no reason to wait at the deadline to do that.
He's probably aiming for Henrique or Wennberg, which aren't worth a 1st pick. Problem is we're short of 2nd and 3rd picks. Wonder how he'll navigate that.
It's also possible that he thinks that Mack, Rants, Nuke, Landy, Lehky and Drouin is a fine top 6 and there's no need to add a 2C.
I think Henrique puts up decent numbers with Nuke attached to his hip. Only NewJost couldn'tI mean Henrique plays 2-3 minutes more per game and probably way more on powerplay. Easy to rack up points with big playing time.(Compared to Colton).
They would be probably close in terms of output if teams changed and roles.
No? Both dmen make more than CM.No there isn't but there would be a need to clear Ryjo's cap though.
Sorry I added Cozens to my last post.No? Both dmen make more than CM.
I agree mostly. Just feel like you have to rip open the window and break it out of the wall if possible so you can win when you're at your peak. But I do think targeting guys like Lehky and Manson who they could sign were very shrewd moves. Time will tell though if keeping Manson over Naz was the right moveThat's close to how I view it, and I agree their draft record makes it harder, but that "competitive as long as possible" time frame, includes some very competitive teams with the best players in the world.
That makes a big difference between the Avs and just a good team being as competitive as long as possible.
Think about it this way. If the Avs went all in every year, there's a good chance they wouldn't have won last year anyway with all their missing players, and they wouldn't have Ritchie, because they probably traded that 1st round pick in a year they shouldn't have.
Which would mean they wouldn't have a potential cheap 2C with Ritchie in future years, that will allow them to keep good players like Val and Lehky, and have more shots at a Cup than they would have by going all in when they shouldn't have.
Also, they may not have Lehky, because they went all in a previous year for a worse player, and couldn't afford him. Manson too, who I think is very valuable in the playoffs, though some disagree.
That's the benefit of calculated aggression. You wait for the right players that fit your team well, and you believe you can keep so they can help you long term, and then you aggressively pursue them like we know the Avs did with Lehky all year. And you don't give up key players/prospects, you give up prospects like Barron or Helleson who play a position you have lots of depth in.
Just my opinion, but I think this is much closer to the optimal strategy for team building under the cap, than just rolling the dice by going all in every year.
They aren't trading him though. He's the reason they want to trade CM.Sorry I added Cozens to my last post.
No there isn't but there would be a need to clear Ryjo's cap though for Cozens.
Perhaps he was still learning the controls.We knew he was bad at it since last season when we went with Compher as 2C and when he wasted a 2nd round draft pick to get retention on Lars f***ing Eller for no God damn reason.
Lol you remember, too.I'm thinking we go for Phaneuf and Kessel.