Boston Bruins 22-‘23 Bruins roster and trade proposals discussions. VII

[Tbaybruin]

Yes I am! Would love Jeannot on the Bruins.

When I saw he was 6th in hits and that incredible AHL point total I became all in.

 

[bruinmann77]

They will add a defenseman for sure and a forward question will it be a top or depth guy. I think Don going to strike before the deadline

 

[arider1990]

Lets say JT miller was somehow some way worth it. How does the cap work? Like we can’t just add some 8 million dollar player here. His contract is ridiculous and going to be bad about 4 years from now, and id you like that Pastrnak guy, werenot getting miller. And Miller is lazy defensively. Why do you think hes the best player on an awful team

He is not even that. Pettersson takes that spot.

 

[BruinsFanSince94]

When I saw he was 6th in hits and that incredible AHL point total I became all in.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?

His point total in the AHL is not anything to write home about in the slightest. Incredible would be an acronym to describe it. He has 52P/107GP; 0.49 PPG.

 

[Kegs]

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?

His point total in the AHL is not anything to write home about in the slightest. Incredible would be an acronym to describe it. He has 52P/107GP; 0.49 PPG.

His final ahl appearance. Like 20 points in the games. He is great. Hits scores fights. Nashville will not trade him.

 

[BruinsFanSince94]

His final ahl appearance. Like 20 points in the games. He is great. Hits scores fights. Nashville will not trade him.

He’d definitely be a welcomed addition. Just not someone I’d move a first for. And as you said, Nashville has no reason to move him.

 

[goldnblack]

Nothing wrong with the future considerations part of the deal - it's allowed, even as you wrote it.

As for trading the player back in the offseason? I'm sure the league may frown upon it, and other team fan bases will scream and shout, especially if the Bruins win the Cup. But I don't think it is against any rule that I can find.

In fact, there is a precedent to this.

The Blues trade Keith Tkachuk to the Atlanta Thrashers in 2007 for a playoff push. Then a week prior to free agency trade Tkachuk back to the Blues where he signed an extension.

There is nothing written in the following CBA's that I can find to prevent that scenario from repeating.

Thanks Dom. A buddy of mine sent me part of the CBA that essentially says "If a team trades away a player and retains salary in the transaction, that team cannot reacquire the player for one calendar year after the date of the transaction."

So that squashes this for sure.

 

[StonedZboril]

If it’s doable getting Toews makes the most sense to me for lineup versatility, center depth, left shot faceoff depth, cup experience and you’re adding a fairly skilled player who can move up and down the lineup for less than top price. Add him and a depth d and roll with that. Secondarily i would also love barbashev, edmundson, or one of their other d.

 

[Mr. Make-Believe]

The Edmundson love is something I don’t understand. We have Forbort already, who is signed for less… and Edmundson eats $3.5M right through next season. If the Bruins are going to make one trade every 30 years with the Montreal Canadiens, I hope to hell this isn’t their target.

 

[DominicT]

8 years for Horvat.

Now we can move on.

 

[bbfan419]

The Edmundson love is something I don’t understand. We have Forbort already, who is signed for less… and Edmundson eats $3.5M right through next season. If the Bruins are going to make one trade every 30 years with the Montreal Canadiens, I hope to hell this isn’t their target.

Agree we don;t need Edmundson, the price for him and Schenn is too high, these guys are not worth a 1st.

 

[DiggityDog]

Wonder what the financials are for Horvat.

 

[Mr. Make-Believe]

8 years for Horvat.

Now we can move on.

Sounds like a sign-and-trade to me.

 

[DominicT]

Sounds like a sign-and-trade to me.

OMG lol

Wonder what the financials are for Horvat.

1 plus 4 is 5 and 4 minus 1 is 3.

It will be complicated.

8 x 8

 

[DiggityDog]

OMG lol


1 plus 4 is 5 and 4 minus 1 is 3.

It will be complicated.

8 x 8

I was just curious about the cap number. I have only seen the initial announcement from the Isles, wasn’t trying to be annoying

 

[Coach Parker]

Focus shifts to Larkin but sounds like he's close like Pastrnak to resigning.

 

[DominicT]

Make it 8.5 as per Friedman

 

[Coach Parker]

OMG lol


1 plus 4 is 5 and 4 minus 1 is 3.

It will be complicated.

8 x 8

Nope, Hertl contract, 8.5.

 

[DominicT]

I was just curious about the cap number. I have only seen the initial announcement from the Isles, wasn’t trying to be annoying

Not annoying at all. Was suppose to be funny on my part based on how his wife came up with the number 14 to wear

 

[Coach Parker]

Give me Hertl 10 times out of 10 between the two. C'mon San Jose, you didn't sign that contract Doug Wilson did so you can move him Grier!

 

[22Brad Park]

Give me Hertl 10 times out of 10 between the two. C'mon San Jose, you didn't sign that contract Doug Wilson did so you can move him Grier!

 

[DiggityDog]

Would not have loved it had Boston given him that deal.

Then again I don’t think they ever had anything the more than a “checking in” interest.

 

[bruinmann77]

I thinking DS holding onto the number one at this point maybe just two dept moves at this point

 

[BruinsFanMike82]

LOL.

"It's too long and it's too much money."

 

[bme44]

Would not have loved it had Boston given him that deal.

Then again I don’t think they ever had anything the more than a “checking in” interest.

Dis agree I think in today's NHL you need to limit how much you have tied up in to few players