Speculation: - 2026-27 Trade/FA thread/Roster Thread - Waiting for the SCF to be over…. | Page 105 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: 2026-27 Trade/FA thread/Roster Thread - Waiting for the SCF to be over….

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
Minty doesnt have that kind of value. People are really overvaluing our assets to the degree people make fun of other teams fans on the trade boards wanting our better players for lower value pieces.

Knies is gonna fetch something way more than we can offer
Agreed. We would have to add that center( not nielson but the other one ) +
 
At this point I'm having serious doubts...

I just wished we had 3 or so Viel/Carrick/Greer types... guys that can actually play up and down the lineup and forecheck with real intentions..... and 1-2 Middleton types on the blueline.

Those are not guys that can play up and down the lineup. Those are 3 4th liners on a good team. Would be a great 4th line but if they're anywhere else you're lacking.
 
Not McQueen no. Wouldnt take that much. Rumor was the beeker said no to MacT + minty for knies at deadline. MacT stock has risen since the trade deadline. Minty too.
[/QUOTE]
 
It would if the rumors of Buffalo and San Jose offering top 10 picks for Knies is true. Minty+ McT or Mcqueen is really the only way to get close.
I guess it’s going to come down to whether the beeker thinks Lacombe can carry a middling dman. Or if he wants to sure up Lacombe with a paryko… Or if he wants to truly upgrade the top 6 from Kreider to a knies. You all think he can’t get both done ( without adding a solberg or a McQueen )
 
I guess it’s going to come down to whether the beeker thinks Lacombe can carry a middling dman. Or if he wants to sure up Lacombe with a paryko… Or if he wants to truly upgrade the top 6 from Kreider to a knies. You all think he can’t get both done ( without adding a solberg or a McQueen )
I’m wondering if he can even get one done let alone both. But I will bet that Parayko is already a Duck and just waiting to announce it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbieboy3686
I think we need a complementary mid-pairing D that can play with LaCombe carrying them (like Trouba was), and a second mid-pairing D that can play like a mid-pairing D, assuming that they can play with Mintyukov.

To maintain a similar level to last year, we don't need a top-pairing D. Anaheim was able to find those type of d-men to play higher up in the lineup often under Murray.

We did have a surprise with the late call-up in Hinds and Helleson's playoff performance on the third line. Therein lies our problem, we have a lot of youth D that haven't taken a huge step forward like LaCombe or need NHL experience like Hinds and Luneau. There's a small possibility that we run an all youth blueline, but that would be a very raw idea on our minds.
 
The stars have had him for years in trade rumors. He isnt anything close to a heart and soul player. Evident by him wanting max term and dollar on a true cup contender in a tax free state. I really hope he gets paid max dollar and becomes the next cheechoo.
I'm never going to fault anyone for wanting to get paid. It's not like he hasn't earned it.
 
To maintain a similar level to last year, we don't need a top-pairing D. Anaheim was able to find those type of d-men to play higher up in the lineup often under Murray.

We did have a surprise with the late call-up in Hinds and Helleson's playoff performance on the third line. Therein lies our problem, we have a lot of youth D that haven't taken a huge step forward like LaCombe or need NHL experience like Hinds and Luneau. There's a small possibility that we run an all youth blueline, but that would be a very raw idea on our minds.
I don’t think verbeek or ownership has any desire to maintain a similar level to last year…
 
I’m always suspicious of people who never ask “how much?” before they commit to a purchase…
Your suspicions are indeed correct. I’m blessed sir… Like the beeker, we want, we get. No questions asked. Price? Haaaaa! Rather have a clear conscience and buy.
 
Thats how good and surprising hes been for this team very big loss
tumblr_40fc8128284c2e3e646989740f57f743_78351fb7_540.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: robbieboy3686
Are we really going to lose Viel? I mean, how much is he asking for? I was hoping we added both Viel and Greer, but are we really striving to be the softest team in the league? Common Beeker... Viel is the absolute minimum resigning before the draft...
Hes done it before already and it was the worst season for this franchise also embarrassing to watch
 
  • Sad
Reactions: cheesymc
Thats how good and surprising hes been for this team very big loss
Trouba will be missed if we can't replace him. I don't think he will be too, too hard to replace, though.

I'm a little surprised that you aren't more indifferent, considering he wasn't all that physical here.
 
Trouba will be missed if we can't replace him. I don't think he will be too, too hard to replace, though.

I'm a little surprised that you aren't more indifferent, considering he wasn't all that physical here.
I think he still was physical but not the punishing defender he was with the Rangers. I think if he was dropped to the 3rd pairing he would have adjusted. Either way Trouba cant be the only physical defender as of now they have nobody just like a couple seasons ago
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad