Styles
No Light, No Signal
- Apr 6, 2017
- 8,416
- 13,631
Well that’s certainly a coherent and good faith argument. We’re not debating whether or not it would’ve been better to keep Hagel. We’re debating whether or not Moore turning into a Dave Bolland makes this pick a success.
Isolating Moore as the return for Hagel is also just objectively bad faith arguing. Pretty easy to convince yourself that you’re right if you ignore the fact that there’s a second first rounder in the deal huh?
And trading Hagel had absolutely nothing to do with “getting Bedard”. When that deal was made Hagel was a very good complimentary player riding a ridiculous shooting bender. No one in their right mind saw a guy that’d end up being good enough to play for Canada at a best on best there. Either way, now that he’s turned into that player, had you not dealt him you’d be faced with the reality of paying a winger 6.5 million dollars a year only to win nothing because you were rebuilding for his entire prime.
I don’t think Moore has anything close to the same game Bolland had from what I’ve seen but I guess I could be wrong? He doesn’t have the physical side Bolland had.