BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 2,514
- 1,603
Moore is a great trade chip. Hes going to be a NHLer and had a high pedigree but he doesnt scare to trade away because theres something missing that would make him into a star.
This 100%. Schaefer and Hagens should be 1 and 2 this year unless something crazy happens. Hawks still lack a true #1 and power play defenseman. Hagens also looks like a legit top line CENTER (very good defensively). If anything, we can trade Nazar/Moore or Korchinski/Rinzel for other needs.Schaefer is phenomenal. You have the chance to take him you run to the podium and figure out the rest later.
Or he played on a gold medal winning team a year younger and put up 3 points in 7 games playing a similar role and the politics was wanting to win again which he certainly helps more than other options.How did Moore make team USA again ? Must have been lots of politics behind that.
Yeah he projected as a high end 3c/good 2c if his O game comes together and he seems to be right on pace with that.Are the people shitting on Moore just looking at the boxscore and judging him based on that alone?
Bolland is a good compareable....the other is Ryan Kessler (121 pts in 151 NDTP games and 31 pts in 40 college games) as opposed to Moore going 172 pts in 170 NDTP games and 50 pts in 59 college games. Moore has every chance of blossoming into a great PK middle 6 C that gives you some complementarty offense in the 50ish point a year range if the O develops as hoped/projected.Yeah he projected as a high end 3c/good 2c if his O game comes together and he seems to be right on pace with that.
He's a very different player but he could have a similar impact of a Dave Bolland. A guy you give all the absolute shit assignments and he always comes out smelling like roses, and chips in some offense to boot.
I know we're all eager to get a star to put alongside Bedard, but Moore could end up playing just as important a role on a winning team.
Most likely, yes.Moore is going to lead an elite third line boys
Yeah basically, he was buzzing around there and had a good game, just no points. I bet if he had like a 2nd assist amongst all the scoring people wouldn't be so complain-y right now. Everyone is getting a little antsy about a 2nd marquee scoring forward, which is why there's all this stuff about like Gabe Perreault, Andrew Cristall or whatever, truth be told you're unlikely to find that guy with an 18th overall pick. Not that it's impossible, just rare.Are the people shitting on Moore just looking at the boxscore and judging him based on that alone?
He’s going to be a good player. They tried to trade up for him and couldn’t believe he fell. They thought he was more than a 3C. I don’t see it. Doesn’t mean he won’t be an important piece on a winning team.Are the people shitting on Moore just looking at the boxscore and judging him based on that alone?
Germans giving the Finns a good game here
Bolland is a good compareable...
I had Moore pegged as a Phil Danault type so elite third liner and capable second on a mediocre team sounds about right
Bollland played with an edge that Moore doesn't have so I don't see it. I'd love it if Moore had a screw loose but that ain't him. And ya just can't teach that either.
NHL teams don't draft defensive centers at 19th overall.