2025 Summer Transfer Rumors and Discussion Closed Window | Page 41 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

2025 Summer Transfer Rumors and Discussion Closed Window

I think the question, especially after ETH, you basically need to triple down on Amorim, who just gave you a historically bad season and would be selling arguably his best player a ton of dough. I would have brought Amorim back if they kept Bruno, but if you are selling him - that is a really big ask. I am not sure I would do it.
Yeah, it's a risky move, no doubt. Would be interesting if Berrada/Wilcox/Vivell have a plan for this (I would assume they do) and what it is. I mean he'd have to be replaced eventually in a few years.
 
Yeah, it's a risky move, no doubt. Would be interesting if Berrada/Wilcox/Vivell have a plan for this (I would assume they do) and what it is. I mean he'd have to be replaced eventually in a few years.
I would assume they don't have a plan for this
 
Selling Fernandes or not should be up to the next manager.
Yeah this is what I mean. If you wanted to say we had a season from hell and we want to run it back; I could see it (not that I agree with it). If you wanted to take the Bruno money and clear the deck and start over; I could see it. I do not think there is a middle ground way to do this.
 
Young talent isn't a plan. No one says they want old and untalented
It literally is.


So what has changed? Ratcliffe simply wants United to target top young talent and move more quickly to get deals done. The days of wasting fortunes on ageing players on big wages are over.

"I would rather sign the next [Kylian] Mbappé rather than spend a fortune buying success," Ratcliffe said in March. "It's not that clever buying Mbappé. Anyone could figure that one out. More challenging is to find the next Mbappé, next Jude Bellingham or next Roy Keane."

I may have posted an Athletic article on it too last year.
 
It literally is.


I may have posted an Athletic article on it too last year.
To me, maybe its just me, its not a plan. At the minimum, its certainly not a unique plan. I don't think you can really take ownership of this as a plan if everyone else tries to do this too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bringer of Jollity
One thing I don’t like about the Wirtz deal is the idea we won’t get a 9. But I assume Darwin and someone else will leave to make that happen
 
To me, maybe its just me, its not a plan. At the minimum, its certainly not a unique plan. I don't think you can really take ownership of this as a plan if everyone else tries to do this too.
It's not a plan. Chelsea is bringing on young talent in multiple times the quantity just as a financial investment.
 
This is Amorim's plan for this summer:


Such players would fit his system.
Which such players are available that are top 5 EPL quality and are willing to go to a club with no European football?
 
This is Amorim's plan for this summer:


Such players would fit his system.
This would be what I call a plan. But again; this assumes full buy in to Amorim. Has he justified that? What does losing Bruno do to this. Utd basically need to say we are tripling down on a manager that probably has the worst PPG in their history. It would be a very bold move
 
One thing I don’t like about the Wirtz deal is the idea we won’t get a 9. But I assume Darwin and someone else will leave to make that happen
I think there are just no 9s out there so we are just trying to get the best game breaker possible. The two guys that they probably think are difference makers are Isak and Alvarez. It would be like FSG to say “hey we just won the league with Diaz/Diogo/etc, let’s roll it over to next year if we can’t get the guy we like” which there are obviously pros and cons to that approach.

I’m not saying no to Wirtz, because I would have to settle on a worse 9, who isn’t an ideal fit. If you want to get really interesting, imagine Wirtz in that false 9 role in that striker-less formation that we dropped on Man City
 
  • Like
Reactions: luiginb
This would be what I call a plan. But again; this assumes full buy in to Amorim. Has he justified that? What does losing Bruno do to this. Utd basically need to say we are tripling down on a manager that probably has the worst PPG in their history. It would be a very bold move
Literally multiple report before the final already that his job is safe and that he'd be given time to properly install his system with new players.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad