Even if he greatly benefitted from MacKinnon and Makar setting him up, you don't put up those numbers without being awesome. I'd be all over adding him as a rental. I don't even care about getting him extended.would he produce here? heard it said he was a product of the mac
Can you imagine the tears with both him and MarchmentDunno why everyone is leaving out the absolute best reason to bring in Rantanen - to behold the seething rage of Avs fans when we play them and he flops all over drawing calls. And then we get to say "nah, he's not diving, he just has poor balance and falls down a lot".
Sooooo...
We are VERY in on Rantanen. This is not a rumor at all. We are going after him hard.
From my source this morning.
It would cost Bourque/Stankoven and a 1st, I'd surmise. Is it possible that they would attempt to sign Rantanen and ship Robertson off in the offseason in order to create the cap space given Robertson's difficult contract demands? That might be a way to bring in a cheap, young RHD to solidify our d-core as well.Sooooo...
We are VERY in on Rantanen. This is not a rumor at all. We are going after him hard.
From my source this morning.
I mean rantanen would be a great get, the cost is the concern especially for a rental. As there's no way to fit his salary demand long termI like it. Everyone wants a big splash on here, and there aren't any D available that are an upgrade, so why not add a big addition to the forwards
Mikko Rantanen with an extension for JRob would be interesting
Agreed- not sure what kind of package the Stars give up to a team that just moved Necas for Rantanen. I feel like the value is similar in JRob than anything else the Hurricanes would wantLast 2 seasons
Robo 143gp-54g-88a-142p -32pim
Rants 141gp-69g-105a-174p -86pim
last 3 seasons
Robo 225gp-100g-151a-251p -52pims
Rants 223gp-124g-155a-279p - 168pim
going from 7.75 for 2yrs, to estimated 10m+
I don't know if I'd want to do that trade. Rantanen is the better player, but how much better and is it worth 2+m more per year, especially since we don't have anyone close to Mackinnon's level to pair him with
Bah gawd that's Wyatt's musicespecially since we don't have anyone close to Mackinnon's level to pair him with
Nate didn't really take off until his 5th season, so there is a chance, but it's in the realm of keep dreamingBah gawd that's Wyatt's music
This is the trade my body needs.Sooooo...
We are VERY in on Rantanen. This is not a rumor at all. We are going after him hard.
From my source this morning.
Especially since I think Dallas will play Colorado in the first round. The pure joy we would all have to watch Rantanen score the series winning goal against them…along with a bunch of other goals he scores on them.It would be hilarious if Stars got Rantanen. Karma for them enjoying Val after he flopped with us, but I just don’t believe Nill will pull it off
Last 2 seasons
Robo 143gp-54g-88a-142p -32pim
Rants 141gp-69g-105a-174p -86pim
last 3 seasons
Robo 225gp-100g-151a-251p -52pims
Rants 223gp-124g-155a-279p - 168pim
going from 7.75 for 2yrs, to estimated 10m+
I don't know if I'd want to do that trade. Rantanen is the better player, but how much better and is it worth 2+m more per year, especially since we don't have anyone close to Mackinnon's level to pair him with
The difference is, I don't see Rantanen for JRob as an "all in". It's shuffling Deck chairs. it's minor improvement, in a position that doesn't need it the most. The blue line is the problem.After weeks of shitting on Nill for being too conservative, making no big splashes at the deadline, and not going all in to win now...
You're staring at the price to do so and are having cold sweats. You have now become Jim Nill.
with the Primary assist to Duchene just for full Colorado melt downEspecially since I think Dallas will play Colorado in the first round. The pure joy we would all have to watch Rantanen score the series winning goal against them…along with a bunch of other goals he scores on them.