Even if he greatly benefitted from MacKinnon and Makar setting him up, you don't put up those numbers without being awesome. I'd be all over adding him as a rental. I don't even care about getting him extended.would he produce here? heard it said he was a product of the mac
Can you imagine the tears with both him and MarchmentDunno why everyone is leaving out the absolute best reason to bring in Rantanen - to behold the seething rage of Avs fans when we play them and he flops all over drawing calls. And then we get to say "nah, he's not diving, he just has poor balance and falls down a lot".
Sooooo...
We are VERY in on Rantanen. This is not a rumor at all. We are going after him hard.
From my source this morning.
It would cost Bourque/Stankoven and a 1st, I'd surmise. Is it possible that they would attempt to sign Rantanen and ship Robertson off in the offseason in order to create the cap space given Robertson's difficult contract demands? That might be a way to bring in a cheap, young RHD to solidify our d-core as well.Sooooo...
We are VERY in on Rantanen. This is not a rumor at all. We are going after him hard.
From my source this morning.
I mean rantanen would be a great get, the cost is the concern especially for a rental. As there's no way to fit his salary demand long termI like it. Everyone wants a big splash on here, and there aren't any D available that are an upgrade, so why not add a big addition to the forwards