2025 NHL Draft: Lose a ton for Porter Martone

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,331
8,706
Canada
Not really sure where to talk about other teams rebuilds, but after noticing Cayden Lindstrom went under another back procedure, the CBJ rebuild really doesn't look as good as I thought it would a few years ago. Lindstrom hasn't played in forever, Jiricek can't make/isn't being played in their lineup for whatever reasons, and Kent Johnson has missed alot of time the last two seasons.

Goes to show how we need alot more development/luck than just drafting all these guys who we like at the moment.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,566
5,655
Not really sure where to talk about other teams rebuilds, but after noticing Cayden Lindstrom went under another back procedure, the CBJ rebuild really doesn't look as good as I thought it would a few years ago. Lindstrom hasn't played in forever, Jiricek can't make/isn't being played in their lineup for whatever reasons, and Kent Johnson has missed alot of time the last two seasons.

Goes to show how we need alot more development/luck than just drafting all these guys who we like at the moment.
Really highlights that you need so much to go right to rebuild and not get stuck in the mud/middle.

CBJ just seems cursed. Some of that is their own doing (just one example, Demidov was right there and lots of people were concerned about Lindstrom's back... and, they seem to not be able to develop prospects) but some of it is just raw bad luck, I mean...

So far, Grier has both seemingly done everything right, or right enough, and also gotten lucky, so we're on a good path. But losing Smith as a top end prospect, or not getting anything from our winger pool, or having Dick/Mukh both top out at 2nd pair, or even finishing too well and drafting 5-6 this year, will hinder our rebuild as well.
 

one2gamble

Registered User
Dec 24, 2007
17,525
8,833
Really highlights that you need so much to go right to rebuild and not get stuck in the mud/middle.

CBJ just seems cursed. Some of that is their own doing (just one example, Demidov was right there and lots of people were concerned about Lindstrom's back... and, they seem to not be able to develop prospects) but some of it is just raw bad luck, I mean...

So far, Grier has both seemingly done everything right, or right enough, and also gotten lucky, so we're on a good path. But losing Smith as a top end prospect, or not getting anything from our winger pool, or having Dick/Mukh both top out at 2nd pair, or even finishing too well and drafting 5-6 this year, will hinder our rebuild as well.
I think you hinted at it here, this rebuild is still rebuilding. It can still go sideways.
 

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
5,102
5,204
If we land in the dreaded 5th-7th overall range it looks like we'll at least have the chance to draft a potential 2C between McQueen, Frondell and Desnoyers.
I think i'd look to trade that pick then for an establish player. Of course this depends on development and who is available to trade for AND if the draft pans out this way as we think, but if we have 6OA it could be valuable to a team in free fall.

I;m not suggesting the players, but a team like the Islanders might salivate at that top-10 first in return for players like Barzal or Dobson.
 

BaileyMacTavish

Hockey lovin' wolf
Nov 8, 2010
14,373
1,879
San Jose
Screenshot_20241120_221651_Free Adblocker Browser.jpg
 

Patty Ice

Mighty Luca
Feb 27, 2002
14,488
4,660
Not California
What happened to Hensler? He was such a hyped RD prospect and now the hype is gone.

He made the bad decision to go to Wisconsin. Michael Farrell has a great write up on what's going on with him on the Prospects board.

 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,179
24,029
Bay Area
I suspect Nashville will be much better. I don’t think we’ll out tank Chicago.

Honestly, there are a shocking amount of bad teams and I actually think the Sharks are kinda trending toward being… not as awful as a few of them.
You gotta think that Bedard will start scoring eventually, right?
 

Friday

Registered User
Apr 25, 2014
5,992
4,063
LA
This draft class is starting off very slow. I was hoping the 3-8 guys would get going so I’d be okay with the Sharks picking 6th but meh so far
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
6,442
11,620
Venice, California
Not to the same extent. Bedard should be putting up 80 points this year. If Will and Mack combine for 80 points, I'd call that a win.

You'd think...? That lineup is pretty rough.

Chicago is the only team I can conceivably see us finishing ahead of at this point.

The Ducks are somehow still pretty bad (rebuild year... #... what, 8?) Pittsburgh seems to be having a Sharks-level collapse. I don't think we'll beat those guys in points, but I think there's like an outside chance the Sharks finish like 4-6th worst.

Either way, I'm kind of thrilled to cheer for wins and to have a WAY more fun team with way more hope while simultaneously knowing that we'll still likely get a top 5 prospect this year.

...boy I want Schaefer.
 

vortexy

Registered User
Jun 13, 2024
159
350
Yep I feel the real contenders we will be battling for the 32/31 spot to guarantee a top 4 pick will be Chicago, Montreal (hopefully when Laine returns they will rise), maybe Columbus/Philly. But if Granlund does get traded, I think that would pretty much guarantee we get that top 4 pick at minimum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad