Prospect Info: 2025 draft discussion

Voodoo Glow Skulls

Formerly Vatican Roulette
Sponsor
Sep 27, 2017
5,745
3,034
My attempt at a top 10.

1. Schaefer
2. Hagens
3. Martone
4. Misa
5. Desnoyers
6. McQueen
7. Frondel
8. Carbonneau
9. Eklund
10. J. Smith
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snuggs

FMichael

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
6,055
6,214
Wisconsin
So if we suck hard enough we'll hopefully drop down and have a shot at 1st overall?

So is this a strong or weak class?

1733166919186.png
 

HoweFan

Registered User
Jan 10, 2017
1,374
936
Carbboneau or Mrtka keep coming to mind for me. I would like a centre but how bad do we need one when we have Larkin, Kasper, Danielson, Lombardi, and Finnie. Even if we had the first pick, Schaffer wouldn’t be out of my possibles
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voodoo Glow Skulls

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,305
20,031
So if we suck hard enough we'll hopefully drop down and have a shot at 1st overall?

So is this a strong or weak class?

View attachment 938871

More like Rasmus Dahlin or Slavkofsky type draft. The 2017 draft was pretty strong in hindsight.

Pettersson, Makar, Heiskanen, Suzuki, Necas, Thomas, Robertson, Batherson, is a decent top end for a draft. Hischer isn't bad either.

Carbboneau or Mrtka keep coming to mind for me. I would like a centre but how bad do we need one when we have Larkin, Kasper, Danielson, Lombardi, and Finnie. Even if we had the first pick, Schaffer wouldn’t be out of my possibles

Draft the most talented player available. Larkin is still in his prime. Kasper is looking really good. Danielson is looking great. Lombardi is looking really good. Center isn't as big a weakness as some fans here perceive it to be right now.
 

Rzombo4 prez

Registered User
May 17, 2012
6,294
3,105
Carbboneau or Mrtka keep coming to mind for me. I would like a centre but how bad do we need one when we have Larkin, Kasper, Danielson, Lombardi, and Finnie. Even if we had the first pick, Schaffer wouldn’t be out of my possibles

More like Rasmus Dahlin or Slavkofsky type draft. The 2017 draft was pretty strong in hindsight.

Pettersson, Makar, Heiskanen, Suzuki, Necas, Thomas, Robertson, Batherson, is a decent top end for a draft. Hischer isn't bad either.



Draft the most talented player available. Larkin is still in his prime. Kasper is looking really good. Danielson is looking great. Lombardi is looking really good. Center isn't as big a weakness as some fans here perceive it to be right now.
You can never have too many centers or defensemen. I agree though that you should not pass on clearly superior wingers just to draft them. We need to be really bad for this draft to be interesting I am afraid. Time will tell though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lilidk

OldnotDeadWings

Registered User
Sep 18, 2013
590
737
The perception of Draft quality can and often does change quite a bit from November to June. Last year Hockey Prospect had Iginla and Sennecke 13th and 14th OA in their November rankings, Parekh 23rd. They all went in the top 10, 6th, 3rd and 9th respectively. Luchanko was at 32, ended up picked 13th. Lots of other movement from where things seemed in November. Wings just need to keep adding skill, especially up front. Not particularly interested yet in big C Roger McQueen, he's been out for a while with a back injury, but he's another name that could figure in Wings' plan if they pick top 10. He started the season with eight goals in eight games.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OgeeOgelthorpe

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,912
15,835
So if we suck hard enough we'll hopefully drop down and have a shot at 1st overall?

So is this a strong or weak class?

View attachment 938871
These guys say the buzz they are hearing from scouts is that it is a below average draft:


Personally I think there are some good options at forward. Also people thought the 2017 draft was weak and teams still got Makar/Petterson from it, so you never know.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,305
20,031
You can never have too many centers or defensemen. I agree though that you should not pass on clearly superior wingers just to draft them. We need to be really bad for this draft to be interesting I am afraid. Time will tell though.

This draft has a top 10 that's about as strong as the really strong 2021 top 10, which could be good for Detroit depending on the final standings. The top end talent isn't on par with 2023, but I think a real top line talent could be had in this year's top 10 draft.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,305
20,031
These guys say the buzz they are hearing from scouts is that it is a below average draft:


Personally I think there are some good options at forward. Also people thought the 2017 draft was weak and teams still got Makar/Petterson from it, so you never know.


Like I said above, I don't see someone emerging as a true #1 overall pick from this class, but the top 10 looks to be very close to each other in quality. I can see a guy like Martone going #1 to as far as #6. Misa could be the same. Frondell could be #4 or he could be #10.
 

Rzombo4 prez

Registered User
May 17, 2012
6,294
3,105

This draft has a top 10 that's about as strong as the really strong 2021 top 10, which could be good for Detroit depending on the final standings. The top end talent isn't on par with 2023, but I think a real top line talent could be had in this year's top 10 draft.
I am a bit more bearish I guess. If McQueen did not have a back injury and Fondel had popped a bit more to date, I might feel differently. I will admit it is still early. I see about six guys I really like, two more that are ok and then a drop. I think we can get a solid top 6 forward, but not necessarily a bona fide first-line talent in that span.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,305
20,031
I am a bit more bearish I guess. If McQueen did not have a back injury and Fondel had popped a bit more to date, I might feel differently. I will admit it is still early. I see about six guys I really like, two more that are ok and then a drop. I think we can get a solid top 6 forward, but not necessarily a bona fide first-line talent in that span.

When I say first line talent I mean kids that are comparable to Beniers, Guenther, McTavish, Eklund, Sillinger, Stankoven, Johnston level of talent. No one that screams "superstar" but guys that may start out their first 3-4 years in the league in the middle 6 but you see growing into 1st line, 60+ point guys.

It'd be amazing to find the next Pastrnak or Rantanen in this draft, but I don't think that will happen. Maybe the next Robertson or Connor?
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,912
15,835
I am a bit more bearish I guess. If McQueen did not have a back injury and Fondel had popped a bit more to date, I might feel differently. I will admit it is still early. I see about six guys I really like, two more that are ok and then a drop. I think we can get a solid top 6 forward, but not necessarily a bona fide first-line talent in that span.
There are like 4-5 kids I really like just from the WHL alone.
 

Reddwit

Registered User
Feb 4, 2016
7,763
3,500
He’s jockeying for 1OA, so I doubt we even have the chance to draft him, but Schaefer would be a dream. I think we actually could still use more offense than defense, but a top 4 of Mo/Ed/Schaefer/ASP is just filthy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wingsfannn919191

Coach Reggie Dunlop

Registered User
Jun 9, 2021
1,156
1,749
Michigan
I think you look at guys like Martone and misa and they look like absolute keys to the puzzle for the wings. MBH is a good complimentary player but he isn’t likely to be a big superstar wing, misa and martone both have this ability. But we have to truly suck to get one of these guys. Really, we just have to pray one of Danielson and kasper is good enough to replace Larkin when he inevitably falls off.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: minimal

Snuggs

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
2,760
1,394
When I say first line talent I mean kids that are comparable to Beniers, Guenther, McTavish, Eklund, Sillinger, Stankoven, Johnston level of talent. No one that screams "superstar" but guys that may start out their first 3-4 years in the league in the middle 6 but you see growing into 1st line, 60+ point guys.

It'd be amazing to find the next Pastrnak or Rantanen in this draft, but I don't think that will happen. Maybe the next Robertson or Connor?
Which kids/guys are suspected to be this good?
 

Snuggs

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
2,760
1,394
My attempt at a top 10.

1. Schaefer
2. Hagens
3. Martone
4. Misa
5. Desnoyers
6. McQueen
7. Frondel
8. Carbonneau
9. Eklund
10. J. Smith
Nice list. Only watched Hagens. I think I like Frondel and McQueen from what I've heard from other friends in the business but I legit know nothing about the rest.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,912
15,835
...and they are?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad