OT: 2024 Washington Commanders thread: change we can believe in!

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,439
11,265
That’s hyperbole.

Gronk? YES
Welker? NO
Moss? YES (but 7 of his best 10 seasons were not in NE)
Edelman? NO
Amendola? LOL
Evans? Meh…. Doubt it.

Hyperbole my friend. Big time.
The minute you expand this discussion past HOF talent (and I’m not sure why that’s where the line was drawn in this thread) this stops being a conversation.

Welker was a 5 time pro-bowler and twice all-pro while in New England, Edelman is like second in postseason receiving yards all-time (and yeah, playing more games helps but nobody should get marked down for winning) and made a career of showing up with big catches. There were a few leaner years, but those guys aren’t bad players, a prime Wes Welker would easily be one of the top targets on this team.

In fact I’d say it’s arguable that the Patriots made use of their WR2/Slot receiver being much better than league average and letting Brady read matchup hell for the defense. Another pro-bowl caliber receiver would be invaluable for Kingsbury and Daniels to do the same, especially since Daniels can run.

So are they all Hall? No, but still very good and not JAGs. I think the only way I’d be reluctant to add is if they felt like McCaffery or someone can get there fairly quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ynotcaps

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
65,832
20,704
That’s hyperbole.

Gronk? YES
Welker? NO
Moss? YES (but 7 of his best 10 seasons were not in NE) (irrelevant, did he have HOF talents to play with or not? Yes/no. Moss is the easiest answer yes.). The others were just great.
Edelman? NO
Amendola? LOL
Evans? Meh…. Doubt it.

Hyperbole my friend. Big time.
I didn’t say only on offense….and Evan’s will be a HOFer assuming his career doesn’t end prematurely. We’ll see. He was most certainly a top end/elite WR for Brady.

How many guys does JD currently have that can even possibly get close to a sniff of that kind of talent and production today, 1?

…and btw I never said those guys on that list were all HOFers, read carefully again, the HOF talent comment was after the list (which is obviously not all inclusive). If you took my follow up HOF comment to mean that list was all HOFer, apologies, that wasn’t my intention and I would have specified if so.
 
Last edited:

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
14,219
11,042
Yeah I mean who knows what a Billionaire is thinking. He may also be seeing things he doesn’t like, things that we have no view of.

What if he already knows Rodgers might be done after this year. Do you sit on your hands or try to alter the course of the ship?

Personally? I’m tanking if I’m them. The Rodgers gamble failed. Retaining the current losers has the benefits of losing while maintaining integrity. -which is what Harris wisely did with Rivera despite Rivera obviously sucking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bananas

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
65,832
20,704
Personally? I’m tanking if I’m them. The Rodgers gamble failed. Retaining the current losers has the benefits of losing while maintaining integrity. -which is what Harris wisely did with Rivera despite Rivera obviously sucking.
So you would rather the ship go down in a flaming heap 5 games in and still a chance to turn it around?

Yeah successful Billionaire businessmen don’t often think like that IMO. They have way too much talent to concede and tank today.
 

ynotcaps

Registered User
Aug 4, 2006
1,993
1,612
I didn’t say only on offense….and Evan’s will be a HOFer assuming his career doesn’t end prematurely. We’ll see. He was most certainly a top end/elite WR for Brady.

How many guys does JD currently have that can even possibly get close to a sniff of that kind of talent and production today, 1?
Yeah, the way to make a shockingly good rookie better is to give him more help. Higgins has had some injury concerns and hasn't produced #1 WR numbers -- but when you share the field w J Chase, you're not gonna be the #1, period.

That's why the proposed price is a 3rd and potentially a another third.

Like I said, I do it. If AP doesn't, OK, he certainly knows better than I. (Unlike the last 35 GMs we had under Satan.)
Looks like maye is gonna be starting sooner than expected
Yeah. He's walking into a shit situation. That line is decimated and their weapons are "meh" at best.
I was never a Maye guy, but it's going to be tough to get a fair read for a while.
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
65,832
20,704
Yeah, the way to make a shockingly good rookie better is to give him more help. Higgins has had some injury concerns and hasn't produced #1 WR numbers -- but when you share the field w J Chase, you're not gonna be the #1, period.

That's why the proposed price is a 3rd and potentially a second.

Like I said, I do it. If AP doesn't, OK, he certainly knows better than I. (Unlike the last 35 GMs we had under Satan.)
This is where I’m at. You have to think they’re considering options. Like damn, you can’t really expect him to do much more than make the playoffs, but still….if it’s to acquire a guy you see as being a key contributor for a few more years….I say go for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ynotcaps

Jags

Mildly Disturbed
May 5, 2016
1,919
2,266
Central Florida
Yeah, the way to make a shockingly good rookie better is to give him more help.

Yes, and the absolute best thing they can do for him is shore up the defense so he doesn't have to score 40 a game to win. He could absolutely use a receiving upgrade, and if we can give up something easy to rent one for this season, great. But the 32-year-olds making league-best money and the oft-injured guys that want $25m a year? No thanks.

The upgrades they made this year are all performing, so I'd like them to stay the course. @g00n is right in his take on the NE comparison. Those guys had greatness is them that was brought out by a top QB playing behind a top O line, all working together to build a thing that none of them wanted to leave. Lots of Pats left money on the table to stay with a great team, and you see some of the stars in KC doing the same now while management embraces turnover in the best ways possible.

That's what I'm pretty sure @g00n is talking about -- building an organization like that, which you don't do by making expensive impulse buys at the checkout counter. You have to spread the money around. Our offense is working pretty great right now. Our D is the squeaky wheel.

Shrewd management FTW. Screaming "Me want! Me want! Me want!" every time a shiny trade target or FA stud becomes available is playing checkers when you should be playing chess.
 

g00n

Retired Global Mod
Nov 22, 2007
31,112
15,593
Yeah but it doesn’t. It’s NYC.


Moss was never a project. Just FYI. Like, ever

Also — guys like Mahomes, Brady, Allen, Manning, etc (past and current) made WR’s better -/ but they also have some great WR’s.

There’s no chicken/egg thing here.

That said, JD5 has McLaurin and…… youth. Is McLaurin the same as Brady/Manning/Mahomes/Allen etc’s top guys? Prob not, when you include TE’s (Altho the RB’s help a LOT).
Moss had a bad rep for a few years and was one of the first to go through the "maybe bb can tame him" thing.

Of course more talent is good but there's a price.
 

ynotcaps

Registered User
Aug 4, 2006
1,993
1,612
Yes, and the absolute best thing they can do for him is shore up the defense so he doesn't have to score 40 a game to win. He could absolutely use a receiving upgrade, and if we can give up something easy to rent one for this season, great. But the 32-year-olds making league-best money and the oft-injured guys that want $25m a year? No thanks.

The upgrades they made this year are all performing, so I'd like them to stay the course. @g00n is right in his take on the NE comparison. Those guys had greatness is them that was brought out by a top QB playing behind a top O line, all working together to build a thing that none of them wanted to leave. Lots of Pats left money on the table to stay with a great team, and you see some of the stars in KC doing the same now while management embraces turnover in the best ways possible.

That's what I'm pretty sure @g00n is talking about -- building an organization like that, which you don't do by making expensive impulse buys at the checkout counter. You have to spread the money around. Our offense is working pretty great right now. Our D is the squeaky wheel.

Shrewd management FTW. Screaming "Me want! Me want! Me want!" every time a shiny trade target or FA stud becomes available is playing checkers when you should be playing chess.
Wow, didnt realize saying that id give up 1, maybe 2 3rds for a legittarget equates to crying "me want" for every trade target out there.

Simply saying I like the idea of adding the exact type of weapon so many of us have been asking for since before the draft.

I'm in favor of the FO being more aggressive this year than I expected because it looks like we have a contender for the playoffs at least. yes, they can and should address defensive holes. But doing so is not mutually exclusive of adding weapons.

I think we should also be a bit more realistic about the fact that NE was already a DB contender before Brady took the field, and before Mahomes lost Tyreke Hill, he HAD Tyreke Hill, along with Kelce. Both teams also were/are led by lock 1st ballot HOF coaches. I lo e where our team is headed, but I'm not gonna pretend that we're in position to follow their blueprint just yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedRocking

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,439
11,265
Moss had a bad rep for a few years and was one of the first to go through the "maybe bb can tame him" thing.

Of course more talent is good but there's a price.
Doesn’t that almost make him the poster child for the other argument? They went out and got him because they needed/wanted the target so bad they rolled the dice on the person (at this point the specific concern is not super important). If I remember correctly they were pretty weak at WR at the time, I had thought they already had Welker but it turns out he and Moss both come in 2007. The top receiver in 2006 was Reche Caldwell, who played the next season in Washington and then never again.... but they still went 12-4 so it's not like it wasn't working.

That all sounds to me like they recognized they couldn’t just bank on churning out system receivers and take advantage of their stellar QB play, so they facilitated change with a semi-high risk/reward factor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ridley Simon

kicksavedave

I'm just here for the memes and gifs.
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2009
11,167
14,237
Fallbrook, CA
www.tiasarms.org
Tom Brady won three super bowls in four years with WRs named Deion Branch, Troy Brown, and David Patten, and TEs Christian Fauria and Daniel Graham.

Jayden Daniels doesn't need help anywhere near as much as the defense does.
 

Ridley Simon

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
18,879
10,104
Marin County — SF Bay Area, CA
The minute you expand this discussion past HOF talent (and I’m not sure why that’s where the line was drawn in this thread) this stops being a conversation.

Welker was a 5 time pro-bowler and twice all-pro while in New England, Edelman is like second in postseason receiving yards all-time (and yeah, playing more games helps but nobody should get marked down for winning) and made a career of showing up with big catches. There were a few leaner years, but those guys aren’t bad players, a prime Wes Welker would easily be one of the top targets on this team.

In fact I’d say it’s arguable that the Patriots made use of their WR2/Slot receiver being much better than league average and letting Brady read matchup hell for the defense. Another pro-bowl caliber receiver would be invaluable for Kingsbury and Daniels to do the same, especially since Daniels can run.

So are they all Hall? No, but still very good and not JAGs. I think the only way I’d be reluctant to add is if they felt like McCaffery or someone can get there fairly quickly.
I think the QB makes the player. Simply put.

Brady made those guys (save Gronk and Moss), not the other way around?

True for many an HOF QB. IMO.

Does that mean I don’t think the Skin should add another top WR? NO, they should. But I can see why they wouldn’t do it.
 

Ridley Simon

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
18,879
10,104
Marin County — SF Bay Area, CA
Yeah, the way to make a shockingly good rookie better is to give him more help. Higgins has had some injury concerns and hasn't produced #1 WR numbers -- but when you share the field w J Chase, you're not gonna be the #1, period.

That's why the proposed price is a 3rd and potentially a another third.

Like I said, I do it. If AP doesn't, OK, he certainly knows better than I. (Unlike the last 35 GMs we had under Satan.)

Yeah. He's walking into a shit situation. That line is decimated and their weapons are "meh" at best.
I was never a Maye guy, but it's going to be tough to get a fair read for a while.
I’d be thrilled w Higgins for a couple of 3rds. To be clear.

Maye is not Daniels. Very different levels of readiness.

Even before the season, that was obvious.

Now? Whoa. That’s all I have to say.
 

Bananas

****
Sponsor
Mar 26, 2007
3,814
1,888
Not to mention these end of the roster types are absolutely gelling and playing their asses off for each other rn. Chemistry is a funny thing and so is “buy-in”. The Mandos have it in spades rn and one way to spoil it on the fly is to bring in multimillionaires with personal agendas that go deeper than team.

I think they should aggressively add talent, but with how they’re playing they can easily wait until they have further solidified the culture shift that appears well underway.

It’s a great spot to be in as there is no pressure to make a move unless something rock solid falls into their laps.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad