Kakko has real value to this team in a 3rd line role with Cuylle and Wennberg. Trading him as part of a package for a RW1 just opens up a big hole on RW3. Sure, Vesey can fill that hole, I guess, but he’s not Kakko. Kakko is a possession monster. He dynamic in a cycle game and I think he will thrive in that role with that kind of system.
That being said, it does make some sense to move him in the offseason in a hockey trade. He’s an RFA with arbitration rights. He’s 1 year from UFA. Assuming he eventually wants to get paid, is he willing to sign a long term deal, considering what the team would be willing to pay him (3-4.5M)? Probably not. A show me deal? Sure, he wouldn’t have much choice but the team clearly doesn’t believe that he’s a top 6 player worthy of PP time. Frankly, if I’m the player, I’m looking to move on if possible to an organization who will commit to me as a player so I can maximize my value and skills. Also part of the equation is the Rangers have Othmann, Berard, Sykora, and Perreault coming up.
Let him step up in the playoffs in a depth role and give the coach flexibility with the lineup for a playoff run, then reassess in the offseason. If you remember, Chytil had 8 goals in 67 games then scored 7 in 20 in the playoffs. The next year he had 22 goals and 45 points. Sometimes, guys need to find the right fit in a group before they can really develop. Kakko has a good role for him on this team as a RW3 and is an important part of the lineup. Trading him now would be a mistake, depending, but especially for a rental, would be absurd.