effen
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2003
- 12,721
- 10,895
That 2nd round pick could be anything. It could even be Jake Leschyshyn.
the condition is attached to the pick wherever it goes now.....the pick is dallas' 4th rounder not ours......Sure but why the condition at all? That makes the pick more valuable not less, no matter how unlikely.
Sure but why the condition at all? That makes the pick more valuable not less, no matter how unlikely.
Not everyone...just the ones that are solely interested in shitting on DruryI feel like everyone is forgetting that Tarasenko essentially forced a trade to FLA.
yeah like others said, when the Rangers traded Lundkvist that was part of the deal they got back...if he did well with Dallas then the Rangers would get a better pick. When they traded that pick to Seattle the condition goes with itSure but why the condition at all? That makes the pick more valuable not less, no matter how unlikely.
You can condition the pick to come back if it’s the better pick, but looks like they didntyeah like others said, when the Rangers traded Lundkvist that was part of the deal they got back...if he did well with Dallas then the Rangers would get a better pick. When they traded that pick the condition goes with it
So give a different pick without a condition.the condition is attached to the pick wherever it goes now.....the pick is dallas' 4th rounder not ours......
sponsored by DraftKingsIt would be awesome if it was its own random condition for that pick though lol.
We will trade you a 5th that becomes a 4th if Zemgus Girgensons scores a goal on a Thursday during a waning gibbous moon
We've definitely made some bad 2nd round picks, but our last 2 were Cuylle and Sykora.Guys how could we ever draft another forever minor league goalie without our 2nd?
who caresSo give a different pick without a condition.
I think Wennberg is a good pickup and everyone probably realizes that. It's just that they want the bigger move.This could end up being one of the better deadline pickups for the Rangers over the last few years. The posters who are upset about this were probably never going to be satisfied anyway.
Am I the only one that doesn’t want Guentzel?I think the play should be Guentzal. He puts us over the top, IMO.
Yea, Nils is running off 24 points in the next 20 games.
Brodzinski/Goodrow/Vesey/Edstrom is your 4th line and 13th forward. Wennberg is a legit 3C and Brodzinski caught some fire bc of Chytil being injured. Its a clear upgrade.This is pointless if all it does is push Brodzinski out of the lineup instead of Goodrow
Not for his priceAm I the only one that doesn’t want Guentzel?
Life is fleeting, bud. I just want to win.Am I the only one that doesn’t want Guentzel?