- Jan 18, 2012
- 35,215
- 53,819
that was my point.Who cares so he doesn’t kill penalties then
that was my point.Who cares so he doesn’t kill penalties then
More and more of a reason why those "fancy" stats mean absolutely shit. I always steer clear of people who rely on them for their analysis.because these player cards are all snakeoil nonsense lol.
yeah we dont need him to . Our PK forwards are good enough as is.Who cares so he doesn’t kill penalties then
i mean some of them are legit, but the Jfresh and those 2 nerds and whomever else tries to visualize every possible aspect of hockey into a neat little video game -esque card are just such bs.More and more of a reason why those "fancy" stats mean absolutely shit. I always steer clear of people who rely on them for their analysis.
I'm not seeing any confirmation of this anywhere.Evolving Hockey says he is a 75 offense/17 defense. This one says 26 offense/72 defense. @GoAwayPanarin who should I trust? or should I just average it out and assume hes 50% at both lol.
I am not trying to be a dick at all I just am confused by the the discrepancy
better on canes?Guentzel on the canes would be so annoying - cant stand that franchise
By adding Wennberg? LOLWe closed the gap today.
He is a legitimate 3C, currently being asked to play out of his depth.By adding Wennberg? LOL
He's too busy playing pocket pool to Isles rumors.Staple really has no clue
Trou trou train loaded up with coal before the series starts.How does anyone beat Florida now, adding Tarasenko?
They asked that about Boston last year.How does anyone beat Florida now, adding Tarasenko?
I know. That is why i was agreeing.I mean .13 ppg is not insignificant. That's an ~11 point swing over a full 82 games.
This is certainly an upgrade on Brodzinski:
FAIR