Gareth Southgate has the players to play a
high press attacking style of football but he literally settled down into a game were they were content at taking their chances on counters and giving up the midfield. They played right into Spain's gameplan
It was the same sort of story in the 2020 Euro's where Southgate literally decided to bring all 10 back to defend and allowed the Italian midfield to dictate the middle.
His personnel choices should be questioned. Rice, Kane and Foden were just too inconsistent and non factors but kept seeing time this tournamemt.
Late to the game on this but as an England supporter, but of the bolded, only style is accurate. England play much more of a passive defense as they encourage passes into the centre before swarming the player to cause a turnover. They were more than happy to have the other team pass it amongst their backline. If England wanted to play that style, then Eddie Howe from Newcastle would be their coach. The demands from Howe of his players mean they're probably one of the teams that require the most stamina.
England could have played that attacking style but Southgate had a number of mistakes in team selection. First, he fell into the Lampard/Gerrard issue from a number of years ago by trying to cram in the country's best players into a style that negated their effectiveness. To which your comment on inconsistent and non-factors I agree with for the most part. Foden was one of the most dangerous players but he plays through the centre for Manchester City, which is where they were playing Bellingham. So Foden, who was on the left kept drifting into the centre which allowed defenders to cover both players and potentially double-team them without too much effort. It's not much of a surprise that you see Bellingham score immediately after Foden is subbed off. The other issue is Kane was useless. Whether he's still recovering from the back injury he had, he was nothing like his former self just jogging as the defense passed the ball around him. He also kept trying to get into the play by dropping back in the midfield which meant there was no outlet for his teammates which just ended up gifting possession back. Toney or Watkins should have gotten more playing time. Again, England should have done a Newcastle and allowed Kane to remain team captain (like Lascelles) but not play him day-in, day-out. I actually think that Rice did well, but that the choice of his partner in midfield was questionable. Wharton was extremely impressive in the games I saw him play with Crystal Palace yet got no minutes. It seems unless you play for Manchester City or United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea or Tottenham, you have a huge mountain to overcome to get into the first 11 of England.
His style got results, but he was extremely lucky on a number of occasions. Yes, England got to the final, but honestly? They didn't deserve to get out of the group stage in my opinion. They only played well in the semi-final against the Dutch.
Spain deserved the trophy. They were much more positive than England were and their high-press was much more impressive and the commitment from the players was evident. When you see Morata do a sliding tackle to prevent a defensive clearance, you can see that Spain bought into the style of play. Not something you saw from the English players.